• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»Document Library»Democracy, governance and randomised media assistance

Democracy, governance and randomised media assistance

Library
Devra C Moehler
2013

Summary

In recent years, the use of field experiments to study the impact of development assistance on democracy and governance outcomes (DG outcomes) has grown tremendously. However, most of the DG field experiments conducted to date focus on only a few sectors, namely elections, community and local governance, and service delivery (Moehler, 2010). Experimentalists have largely overlooked other DG sectors, such as media development assistance. This paper investigates the potential for field experiments to contribute to our understanding of the intersection between media, democracy and governance. It reviews the small body of pioneering field experiments on media and political development, and it outlines some of the obstacles to conducting and learning from field experiments in this sector. Finally, the paper suggests opportunities for building a body of experimental evidence that can inform DG interventions in the media assistance sector.

This paper focuses attention on randomised field experiment s in the developing world that explicitly address the use of media to achieve DG outcomes. It concentrates on the opportunities and challenges of field experiments, under the assumption that field experiments should be viewed as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, other methods. Typically, a multi-method approach yields a more useful evidence base for understanding development issues.

The paper is divided into six sections. The first section describes the growth of DG assistance and the increasing interest in DG field experiments. The second section describes the domain of media assistance targeted at DG outcomes. The third provides an overview of current experimental and quasi-experimental studies on the intersection between media, democracy and governance. The fourth and fifth sections describe some of the challenges to successfully employing field experiments to inform media assistance programmes. The final section concludes by arguing for the benefits of practitioner-academic collaborations that provide experimental evidence about the influences on as well as the effects of media content related to democracy and governance.

Source

Moehler, D. C. (2013). Democracy, governance and randomised media assistance. Working Paper 4. BBC Media Action.

Related Content

Factors supporting the emergence of democracies
Helpdesk Report
2016
Elections and democracy support
E-Learning
2015
Political systems
Topic Guide
2014
Social mobilisation in urban contexts
Helpdesk Report
2014
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2018; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2018; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2018

Sign up to our email bulletin:

Sending ...

Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2018; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2018; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2018

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more