GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Security for Whom? SSR and Public Security in Nepal

Security for Whom? SSR and Public Security in Nepal

Library
Charlotte Watson, Rebecca Crozier
2009

Summary

What are the priorities in terms of security in Nepal? What contribution can the European Union (EU) make towards building and maintaining peace in the country? This briefing from International Alert examines security sector reform (SSR) and public security in Nepal. It argues that there is an urgent need to address security provision and the security sector as part of Nepal’s ongoing peace process.

Nepal’s peace process is fragile and levels of insecurity remain high. SSR and public security initiatives planned in tandem are key to improving the security situation in Nepal. However, given the sensitivity of SSR, thought needs to be given to how to lay the groundwork for SSR under the banner of public security. If something is not done to address the current public security situation, longer-term SSR initiatives will be jeopardised. The EU can play a significant role in developing and sustaining a human security approach that addresses public security in the context of long-term SSR.

Any SSR process must take into account a wide range of security actors in Nepal including both state providers and traditional and community-level organisations. SSR processes will need to assess the roles of security service providers including the army, the armed police force, the police and political youth wings. With regard to SSR and public security in Nepal:

  • Discussions about SSR are in their infancy and progress is hampered by political manoeuvring and disagreements over the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) integration into the Nepal Army.
  • Little consideration has been given to how SSR will take into account local-level realities and wider public security needs.
  • Public security appears to be deteriorating. The perceived lack of attention to this is having a negative effect on public faith in the government and the peace process.
  • The Nepal Police lack the necessary capacity and resources and do not have the full trust of the population. Community mechanisms remain the first recourse for the majority of the population.
  • Public security is threatened by a significant minority of youth who feel, and often are, excluded from the political process.
Progress on SSR is likely to be stalled until the issue of army integration is resolved. In the meantime, addressing public security issues is an immediate priority in order to maintain peace and pave the way for longer-term SSR. The European Commission, EU member states and other donors should:
  • support the development of a realistic system for local consultation on security issues and build the will and capacity of stakeholders to engage in consultation;
  • develop increased understanding of local dispute resolution mechanisms and community organisations in order to establish how they could be supported and/or support local peace councils;
  • support information sharing between Kathmandu and districts and establish a public security forum to develop a common understanding of public security and SSR issues;
  • consider how aid can impact on local security and link public security priorities to ensuring that youth play a positive role in political discussions;
  • support the development of capacity within the Ministry of Peace and Reconstruction to implement Nepal Peace Trust Fund (NPTF) priorities; and
  • balance support to the NPTF with support to initiatives addressing wider public security challenges.

Source

Watson C., Crozier R., 2009, 'Security for Whom? SSR and Public Security in Nepal', International Alert

Related Content

Varieties of state capture
Working Papers
2023
Non-State Policing in Fragile Contexts
Helpdesk Report
2019
Drivers and enablers of serious organised crime in Southeast Asia
Helpdesk Report
2019
Serious and Organized Crime in Jordan
Helpdesk Report
2019

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".