GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Security Sector Reform in Nepal: Challenges and Opportunities

Security Sector Reform in Nepal: Challenges and Opportunities

Library
Dhruba Kumar, Hari Sharma
2005

Summary

Security Sector reform in Nepal is crucial to peace negotiations with the rebel CPN (Maoist) but has seldom been raised as an issue outside it. This paper, published by Friends For Peace, explores the difficulties of implementing Security Sector Reform in Nepal, and makes recommendations as to how these can be overcome. It concludes that mapping SSR in Nepal is a delicate and complex issue, and the loyalty of the security sector to democratic government is still under dispute. It recommends that demobilization of the army and guerillas should be accompanied by the provision of economic opportunities to allow them to reintegrate into society.

Security Sector reform (SSR) is defined as a process of making security apparatuses of the state more responsible to citizens and their welfare. The security sector comprises the armed forces, paramilitary, police, intelligence and secret services. The management and oversight agencies under which these operate comprise executive and legislative bodies, judicial and law enforcing agencies, financing and auditing agencies and civil society.

Mapping SSR in Nepal is a delicate and complex issue.

  • It is an internally resisted but externally induced subject of inquiry that has raised many eyebrows.
  • Domestically, SSR is not confined to the civil-military relations. It has roots in the formation of the Nepalese state, the recruitment pattern of strategic elites, and the process of governance under a monarchical system.
  • The loyalty of the security sector to democratic government, particularly that of the Royal Nepal Army, is still under dispute.

Assuming that a negotiated settlement is reached between the government and the Maoists, the latter may lay down their arms.

  • Both parties may agree to demobilise. They may also agree to a restructuring of the national armed forces. This should be carried out by forming a joint political and military commission.
  • Demobilisation should be accompanied by the provision of economic opportunities to disarmed soldiers and insurgents. The sudden influx of people in the job market should be managed through sustained financial compensation, and occupational training.
  • Clarifying the position of monarchy in the country should be a primary objective of SSR because, in the past, the army has been an extended arm of the monarchy.
  • Another priority should be the removal of the blanket impunity provided to the security forces under Article 20 of Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Control and Punishment) Act (TADA). This will make the security forces aware of their limitations in counter-insurgency operations.
  • Government in Nepal should work and function for the people and the state when the country is in crisis. The critical issue of trampling of the constitution and usurpation of the executive power of the state by the king should first be addressed before paying attention to the technicalities through which the SSR can be implemented in Nepal.           

Source

Kumar D., Sharma H., 2005, 'Security Sector Reform in Nepal: Challenges and Opportunities', Friends for Peace, FFP Publications, Nepal

Related Content

Varieties of state capture
Working Papers
2023
Aid and non-state armed groups
Helpdesk Report
2020
Non-State Policing in Fragile Contexts
Helpdesk Report
2019
Rebuilding Pastoralist Livelihoods During and After Conflict
Helpdesk Report
2019

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".