GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»The Design of Pro-Poor Policies: How to Make Them More Effective

The Design of Pro-Poor Policies: How to Make Them More Effective

Library
Sayantan Ghosal
2013

Summary

This paper focuses on the micro-level impact of aid-funded projects and how the design of such projects can maximise their impact on poverty alleviation. It draws on the literature and on field research among sex workers in Kolkata, India, that provides evidence about the impact of raising aspirations in a marginalised, stigmatised community. Findings include the following:

  • Conventional analyses of poverty traps do not often consider the psychological mechanisms through which the experience of poverty forms the beliefs, values and aspirations of the poor.
  • Pro-poor policies tend to focus on relaxing external constraints that may perpetuate poverty traps, such as lack of credit or insecure property rights, but internal constraints such as learned helplessness, pessimistic beliefs and an external locus of control are also important.
  • These internal constraints are endogenous because they adapt to the experience of chronic poverty. Over time, however, they become an independent source of disadvantage for poor persons in their own right.
  • Pro-poor policies aimed at raising aspirations will alleviate poverty more effectively than those that address external constraints alone.
  • The ‘Dream Building’ sessions pioneered by the Durbar Foundation to empower a marginalized, stigmatized community of sex workers in Kolkata provides one case in which interventions aimed at raising aspirations had measurable success.

Source

Ghosal, S. (2013). The Design of Pro-Poor Policies:How to Make Them More Effective. London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs.

Related Content

Affirmative action around the world Insights from a new dataset (update)
Working Papers
2023
Increasing Birth Registration for Children of Marginalised Groups in Pakistan
Helpdesk Report
2021
Role of Faith and Belief in Environmental Engagement and Action in MENA Region
Helpdesk Report
2021
LGBT rights and inclusion in Small Island Developing States (SIDS)
Helpdesk Report
2021

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".