GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»What Works and What Does Not: A Discussion of Popular Approaches for the Abandonment of Female Genital Mutilation

What Works and What Does Not: A Discussion of Popular Approaches for the Abandonment of Female Genital Mutilation

Library
R. Elise Johansen et al.
2013

Summary

A range of interventions have been carried out over the past few decades to promote the abandonment of female genital mutilation (FGM). While these efforts have had varied success, the prevalence of FGM is reducing in nearly all the countries in which it is traditionally practiced. In most cases, however, this decrease has been slow, raising questions about the efficacy of interventions to eliminate FGM. This paper assesses existing evidence on the effectiveness of the most common approaches over the past 30-40 years: health risk approaches, conversion of excisers, training of health professionals as change agents, alternative rituals, community-led approaches, public statements and legal measures. The authors then offer guidance on how best to design and implement programmes that promote the abandonment of FGM.

Key Findings:

Many surveys have found women who express a negative attitude to the continuation of FGM, but who still intend to let their daughters undergo the practice. A major reason for this apparent contradiction between attitude and behaviour is a social and cultural pressure to uphold the tradition. Therefore, the importance of a community-wide change to enable individual families to abandon FGM is now widely recognised. Experience shows that large-scale abandonment can only be expected when FGM is no longer an all-dominant social norm and families can abandon the practice without the risk of stigmatisation and exclusion.

Recommendations:

  • A comprehensive and holistic programme for the abandonment of FGM, including different types of activities, is the best way to facilitate positive change given that: targeting FGM seems to be most effective and well-received when a broader approach is used, assisting the community with other challenges; the conversion of community leaders to speak out against FGM and a favourable legal framework create an enabling environment; and peer groups are crucial since the majority of people are only willing to accept and adapt to information when it comes from people similar to themselves.
  • Effective FGM interventions must have a thorough design and planning oriented toward local adaptation – the basic content of which should be a situation analysis and baseline assessment prior to any intervention – in order to establish a community’s readiness to change, as well as other factors related to FGM (decision-making processes, power dynamics, meanings attributed to the FGM, etc.).
  • Another best practice is including plans and procedures for monitoring the process, including thorough documentation of each step of the intervention. Additionally, the outputs and outcomes should be evaluated either to compare the situation before and after, and/or to establish a comparison site.
  • Interventions require substantial time, which may vary considerably between communities, before they can result in actual change. Therefore, long-term interventions are better-suited to promoting and achieving their outcomes regarding the abandonment of FGM.

Source

Johansen, R., Diop, N., Laverack, G. and Leye, E. (2013). What Works and What Does Not: A Discussion of Popular Approaches for the Abandonment of Female Genital Mutilation. Obstetrics and Gynecology International.

Related Content

Norm diffusion: How global gender norms are adopted in low and middle-income countries
Working Papers
2023
Donor Support for the Human Rights of LGBT+
Helpdesk Report
2021
Interventions to Address Discrimination against LGBTQi Persons
Helpdesk Report
2021
Documentation of survivors of gender-based violence (GBV)
Helpdesk Report
2021

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".