GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Inclusivity and local perspectives in peacebuilding: Issues, lessons, challenges

Inclusivity and local perspectives in peacebuilding: Issues, lessons, challenges

Library
Antonia Does
2013

Summary

Recent attention on inclusivity so far has not translated into major changes in the way international actors operationalise peace building. This paper identifies key issues, lessons and challenges that need to be taken into consideration for strengthening and deepening the uptake of diverse perspectives in peacebuilding processes. It highlights that inclusivity is about engagement at various levels by multiple actors at the same time.

The paper draws on an expert meeting organised by the Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation and the Geneva Peacebuilding Platform held in Sweden in 2013. It also forms part of a larger initiative that aims to develop a sector-wide strategy for strengthening and deepening the uptake of diverse perspectives in peacebuilding processes.

Key findings:

  • Inclusivity can best be achieved by aligning engagements in multiple, overlapping processes at various levels, with multiple actors at the same time.
  • Contextualisation is key to the successful implementation of a strategy.
  • Inclusivity does not only refer to when to include whom in the peace process leading up to a peace agreement in the aftermath of violent conflict. It also refers to the connections between multiple processes within differing levels of society, in different places and driven by a diversity of actors.
  • The current institutional structure of international organisations such as the United Nations is a challenge to them engaging with and operating in local peacebuilding contexts.
  • Generating greater buy-in among decision-makers is needed to operationalise true inclusivity in peacebuilding processes.

Recommendations:

  • The role of international actors in peacebuilding contexts should mostly be limited to one of  catalyst and facilitator, with an focus on improving their capacity to build and maintain relationships with local actors.
  • Reaching higher levels of inclusivity requires an action framework that is based on multi-layered and multi-stakeholder designs. It is necessary to engage at various levels and establish mechanisms for linkages between them. This should involve the national government, external actors, civil society organisations and communities.
  • Flexibility and continuity are important factors in order to enable adapting to the local context and promoting local ownership.

Source

Does, A. (2013). Inclusivity and local perspectives in peacebuilding: Issues, lessons, challenges (Paper No. 8). Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation, Geneva Peacebuilding Platform.

Related Content

Gender, countering violent extremism and women, peace and security in Kenya
Helpdesk Report
2020
Key Drivers of Modern Slavery
Helpdesk Report
2020
Media/communications on peacebuilding/social cohesion/changing prevailing narratives on conflict
Helpdesk Report
2020
International Actors' Support on Inclusive Peace Processes
Helpdesk Report
2020

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".