GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Analysing nutrition governance in fragile contexts: lessons and implications

Analysing nutrition governance in fragile contexts: lessons and implications

Library
Andrés Mejía Acosta
2013

Summary

This briefing describes lessons learnt and implications from a MQSUN assignment which main objective was to analyze the research and policy challenges for improving nutrition governance in a context of state fragility. Efforts to strengthen government commitment to reduce under nutrition in Fragile and Conflict Affected States (FCAS) face a number of context specific challenges:

  • First, most nutrition investments tend to adopt short-term humanitarian approaches to tackle food and hunger crises.
  • Secondly, FCAS usually lack the capacity to design and implement their own nutrition strategies, thus reinforcing their dependency on the policy advice, technical training and funding from the donor community.
  • Thirdly, there are very weak or nonexistent accountability linkages between the state and society in FCAS, so that citizens lack the means to hold their governments to account and political elites lack the incentives to respond to citizens’ demands.

Policy recommendations:

  • National governments should evaluate existing nutrition initiatives and aim to orchestrate multiple nutrition responses under a single institutional framework or strategy.
  • Donors operating in fragile and conflict affected situations should endorse emergency nutrition responses such as CMAM or blanket feeding that have the greatest potential for embedding preventive care. Cash transfers are another instrument that has greater long-term impact.
  • Multilateral and bilateral agencies need to establish ways to combine and fund long term nutrition programming through funds that are allocated on a short-term yearly basis with those that could be allocated through multi year funding. Synchronizing funding cycles could open the door to an effective division of labour and sustained nutrition funding without undermining reporting requirements.
  • Donors and country governments need to develop improved budget tracking devices to allow governments greater ownership over nutrition funding while ensuring the accountability of donor contributions. SUN has already developed a costing tool that captures the volume and type of nutrition related expenditure.

Source

Mejía Acosta, A. (2013). Analysing nutrition governance in fragile contexts. MQSUN Briefing 02. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton.

Related Content

Varieties of state capture
Working Papers
2023
Scaling plastic reuse models in LMICs
Helpdesk Report
2023
Donor Support for the Human Rights of LGBT+
Helpdesk Report
2021
Interventions to Address Discrimination against LGBTQi Persons
Helpdesk Report
2021

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".