• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»Document Library»Are Female Leaders Good for Education? Evidence from India

Are Female Leaders Good for Education? Evidence from India

Library
Irma Clots-Figueras
2012

Summary

This paper finds that, in India, increasing female political representation increases the probability that an individual will attain primary education in urban areas, but not in rural areas, and not in the study sample as a whole. The difference between rural and urban areas may be explained by female politicians investing more in education where women can gain more benefit from it, or by educational investments being more visible to voters in urban areas.

The paper studies the impact of the gender of politicians in Indian state governments on the educational achievements of a sample of citizens who live in the districts where these politicians are elected. It uses a dataset containing information on 29,686 politicians who contested seats in the 16 largest states in India during the period 1967–2001. These data are combined with National Sample Survey data to estimate the effect of the gender of politicians on the primary educational attainment of individuals who were of school age when those politicians were in power in their districts in India.

Findings indicate that female politicians increase educational attainment in urban areas. Increasing female political representation by 10 percentage points increases the probability that an individual attains primary education in urban areas by 7 percentage points, which is approximately 9 percent of the total probability that an individual obtains primary education in an urban area. By contrast, female representation does not have an effect on individuals living in rural areas of the district, or on the sample as a whole.

Female politicians also encourage school attendance and discourage dropouts in urban areas. They have a positive impact on the fraction of villages that have primary schools, particularly in those districts with a higher urban population.

Source

Clots-Figueras, I., 2012, 'Are Female Leaders Good for Education? Evidence from India', American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp.212-44

Related Content

Youth initiatives supporting citizen engagement with government
Helpdesk Report
2017
Communication interventions supporting positive civic action in Lebanon
Helpdesk Report
2017
Threats to and approaches to promote freedom of religion or belief
Helpdesk Report
2017
Civil Society in Authoritarian Regimes
Helpdesk Report
2017
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022