GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Border in Name Only: Arms Trafficking and Armed Groups at the DRC-Sudan Border

Border in Name Only: Arms Trafficking and Armed Groups at the DRC-Sudan Border

Library
Joshua Marks, Small Arms Survey
2007

Summary

While assumptions based on ethnic ties and availability of small arms suggest otherwise, arms trade between the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and South Sudan is modest. This Small Arms Survey report explores the influence of history, geography and recent conflict on the small arms trade on the border between the DRC and Sudan. Despite the current low demand for weapons, experience has shown that border communities remain vulnerable to the spillover effects of conflict and armed groups.

Several factors suggest that a robust trade in weapons might take place across the 628km border between the DRC and Sudan. Despite borders imposed by colonial powers that cut through ethnic groups, post-colonial Congolese and Sudanese have relied on their shared ethnicity to foster cross-border cultural, economic and trade ties. DRC and South Sudan civil wars in the past thirty years caused the temporary and, in some cases, permanent migration of combatants between the two countries. The border is marked by minimal controls and inaccessible roads and terrain.

Despite assumptions to the contrary, this study finds that arms trade between the DRC and Sudan is modest. General trends in small arms flows in the region include:

  • Small arms trafficking occurs in small-scale transactions at markets on the Sudanese side of the border. Any arms movement that exists flows from South Sudan to the DRC.
  • Demand is weak on both sides of the border. South Sudanese communities remain saturated with small arms. In the DRC, rigorous civilian disarmament efforts by the army and lack of perceived need for arms among civilians have kept demand low.
  • Remoteness of the area and decrepit conditions of cross-border routes restrict all types of trade.
  • Armed civilians move easily and, to a large extent, undetected, in and out of both countries. Poachers and nomadic pastoralists, who have crossed the border for years, are tolerated by citizens and rarely hampered by local authorities.
  • Current and former soldiers of the Sudan People’s Liberation Army have exploited their ethnic links in the DRC to trade in guns and other merchandise.
  • The presence of armed groups on the border, including Uganda’s Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA), acts as a check on arms trade.

Despite the current low demand for weapons, border communities remain vulnerable to the spillover effects of conflict and armed groups. The following recent armed group activity highlights this vulnerability:

  • In 1998, the Sudan People’s Liberation Army crossed the border and ransacked parts of northern DRC. Because border controls barely existed, they remained, unencumbered, for years.
  • Seven years after its arrival, the LRA nearly brought a conflict originating in Uganda into northern DRC.
  • The recently-renewed Juba peace negotiations have not eliminated the potential LRA threat to communities on both sides of the border. Should the LRA decide to go on the offensive, there is currently little or no military presence to oppose the group.

Source

Marks, J., 2007, Border in Name Only: Arms Trafficking and Armed Groups at the DRC-Sudan Border, The Human Security Baseline Assessment, Small Arms Survey, Geneva

Related Content

Varieties of state capture
Working Papers
2023
Aid and non-state armed groups
Helpdesk Report
2020
Non-State Policing in Fragile Contexts
Helpdesk Report
2019
Serious and Organized Crime in Jordan
Helpdesk Report
2019

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".