GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Does Cash for School Influence Young Women’s Behavior in the Longer Term? Evidence from Pakistan

Does Cash for School Influence Young Women’s Behavior in the Longer Term? Evidence from Pakistan

Library
Andaleeb Alam, Javier Baez, Ximena Del Carpio
2011

Summary

An early evaluation of the Punjab Female School Stipend Program, a conditional cash transfer, shows that the enrolment of eligible girls in middle-school increased in the short term by nearly 9 percentage points. This paper uses regression discontinuity and difference-in-difference analyses to show that five years into the programme implementation positive impacts do persist. Beneficiary adolescent girls are more likely to progress through and complete middle school and work less. There is suggestive evidence that participating girls delay their marriage and have fewer births by the time they are 19 years old. Also, girls who are exposed to the programme later-on, and eligible for the benefits given in high school, increase their rates of matriculating into and completing high school. Lastly, there is no evidence that the program has negative spill-over effects on educational outcomes of male siblings.

The positive impacts of the FSSP on educational attainment suggest that the programme may have important implications for future productivity and welfare of beneficiaries. For instance, women in Punjab that complete middle and high school live in households that enjoy up to 30 percent higher consumption per capita, relative to women with less than middle school education. One possible reason is that more educated women are able to marry men who have almost twice as much education as the husbands of women with less education. Another explanation is that higher schooling may enable Pakistani women to increase their own earnings by as much as 150 percent. This estimated annual income increase more than compensates for the annual stipend cost of the programme.

Finally, the impacts of the FSSP may have further dynamic effects on other dimensions. Women in Punjab with middle and high school education have around 1.8 fewer children than those with less education by the end of their reproductive life. It is also estimated that the 1.4-year delay in marriage attributed to the programme may lead to 0.4 fewer births by the end of the women’s childbearing years. Furthermore, the evidence also shows that these women not only have fewer children but also invest more in their human capital, which may lead to positive intergenerational effects.

Source

Alam, A., Baez, J. & Del Carpio, X. (2011). Does Cash for School Influence Young Women's Behavior in the Longer Term? Evidence from Pakistan. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5703. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labour.

Related Content

War Economy in North East Nigeria
Helpdesk Report
2020
Impacts of Covid-19 on Inclusive Economic Growth in Middle-income Countries
Helpdesk Report
2020
Social protection
Topic Guide
2019
Social Safety Nets in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States
Helpdesk Report
2019

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".