• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»Document Library»Engaging Men and Boys in Changing Gender-based Inequity in Health: Evidence from Programme Interventions

Engaging Men and Boys in Changing Gender-based Inequity in Health: Evidence from Programme Interventions

Library
Gary Barker, Christine Ricardo, Marcos Nascimen
2007

Summary

How do social constructions of masculinity affect health equity? What kinds of interventions can produce behavioural change in men and boys? This review assesses the effectiveness of programmes seeking to engage men and boys in achieving gender equality and equity in health. Gender norms influence how men interact with their partners, family and children on a wide range of health issues. Programmes that include gender-transformative elements, and those that are integrated with wider community outreach or mobilisation initiatives, are more effective in producing behavioural change.

The social expectations of what men and boys should and should not do and be directly affect attitudes and behaviour related to a range of health issues. These include HIV prevention, sexual and reproductive health, gender-based violence, parenting and maternal health. The health of both men and women can be placed at risk due to prevailing notions of manhood and masculinity, which stem from patriarchal structures and social norms that are the source of gender inequality and oppression. Consequently, men and boys who adhere to more rigid views of masculinity are more likely to have used violence against a partner, to have had a sexually transmitted infection, to have been arrested and to have used substances.

There are a growing number of health-related programmes targeting men that seek to achieve gender equality and equity in health. However, those most effective at instigating behavioural change include a gender-transformative element – they seek to change the social construction of masculinity and promote more gender-equitable relationships. Further:

  • There has been a move from single-issue interventions (such as providing vasectomy or promoting condoms) to programmes working on multiple health areas and with a more integrated perspective.
  • Most programmes are small-scale, short in duration and rarely last beyond the pilot stage.
  • Few programmes seek to reach men and boys at different stages of their life-course. Rather, most only focus on a specific age group of men or boys during a short project span.

Programmes are more effective at producing behavioural change in men and boys when integrated into community outreach and mass media campaigns. Group sessions combined with community campaigns, mass-media campaigns or individual counselling can provide sustainable changes in attitudes and behaviour. In addition:

  • Group education activities should critically reflect on masculinities and gender norms, and themes and discussions should be connected to real life situations.
  • Campaigns and community outreach initiatives should be based on initial research that tests campaign messages for effectiveness with the target group.
  • High-quality mass media content, including commercials, soap operas and radio dramas are expensive but reach the highest number of men and boys.
  • The most effective campaigns last from six months to a year and seek opportunities to present their messages on a weekly or daily basis.
  • Health services need to be delivered by professionals who have been sensitised to men’s health issues rather than those who would usually work with women. In addition, physical spaces and educational materials need to be designed specifically for men.
  • Home visits are particularly effective: in many cases men are reluctant to visit clinics or are reluctant to take time off. Even a single counselling session can lead to behavioural change, such as increased contraceptive use.

Source

Barker, G., Ricardo, C. and Nascimento, M., 2007, ‘Engaging Men and Boys in Changing Gender-based Inequity in Health: Evidence from Programme Interventions’, WHO / Promudo, Geneva

Related Content

Documentation of survivors of gender-based violence (GBV)
Helpdesk Report
2021
Interventions in LICs and LMICs to improve air quality and/or mitigate its impacts
Helpdesk Report
2020
Monitoring Air Quality in Low- Income and Lower Middle-Income Countries
Helpdesk Report
2020
Prevalence of health impacts related to exposure to poor air quality among children in Low and Lower Middle-Income Countries
Helpdesk Report
2020
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022