• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
  • Social Development
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»Document Library»Governance Indicators: A Users’ Guide

Governance Indicators: A Users’ Guide

Library
UNDP
2007

Summary

Demand for ways to measure different aspects of democracy, human rights and governance is increasing. This has led to a rapid growth in the number of indicators to assess government performance, the quality of institutions and people’s perceptions. This guide, put together by the United Nations Development Programme and the European Commission, offers advice on where to find and how to use governance indicators.

A governance indicator is a measure of one or more aspects of the state of governance in a country. Such indicators usually focus on specific areas of governance such as electoral systems, human rights, public service delivery, civil society and corruption. In the development field, they can be used to monitor and evaluate governance programmes and projects and to establish benchmarks, goals and targets. This guide for non-specialist users is divided into two main parts. The first offers generic guidance on governance indicators and how to select appropriate data in different situations. The second section is a source guide, which uses a set format to describe 33 existing sources of governance information, all available on the internet. The first page on each source outlines its main characteristics, and the second provides an example of the data and guidance on how to use it in a valid way.

The first part of the guide addresses four key questions. The first three are:

  • What is the problem? Governance indicators can be conceptualised at different levels depending on what is being measured. Here they are grouped into three levels: input, process and output.
  • Indicators at the first level would cover countries’ formal commitments to governance; at the second they would look at action to fulfil them; and at the third they would measure the numbers of people enjoying rights.
  • How can we get the data? It is important to consider who is gathering the information and how the method of data collection affects the results.
  • This section also examines the four main kinds of primary data sources that serve as a basis for governance indicators: standards, codes and treaties; events-based data; narrative reports; and surveys.
  • What data can we get? There are many different types, and the main ones are examined here. They include objective measures, results based on perceptions of a country’s residents and results based on external perceptions.

The fourth question asks: how can we use the data? The guide suggests three important rules to apply in each situation:

  • Use a range of indicators. No single indicator allows for comprehensive, balanced comparison. Using just one can produce a false assessment, but too many can be confusing. A balanced set is needed.
  • Use an indicator as the first question, not the last. The more detailed an indicator, the more likely it is to point to actions that could improve results. Indicators can be developed as information becomes available.
  • Understand an indicator before using it. This is perhaps the most crucial rule, because using an indicator implicitly indicates endorsement of it, including its methodology and assumptions.
  • This section also suggests a checklist for an indicator’s attributes. The list covers validity, reliability, measurement bias, transparency, breadth of representation, variance truncation, information bias and aggregation problems.

Source

UNDP, 2007, ‘Governance Indicators: A Users' Guide’, Second Edition, United Nations Development Programme, Oslo Governance Centre, Oslo

Related Content

Indicators and Methods for Assessing Entrepreneurship Training Programmes
Helpdesk Report
2018
Aid Absorption: Factors and Measurements
Helpdesk Report
2018
Humanitarian results indicators and how they relate to the SDGs
Helpdesk Report
2017
Indicators for conflict, stability, security, justice and peacebuilding
Helpdesk Report
2015
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022