GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service: OECD Guidelines and Country Experiences

Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service: OECD Guidelines and Country Experiences

Library
J Bertok
2003

Summary

With ever-changing public sector environments, managing conflicts of interest will always be a source of concern for governments. What examples of good practice exist to deal effectively with conflicts of interest in the public service? These guidelines produced by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) aim to help governments review and modernise their conflict-of-interest policies in the public sector. The report highlights trends, approaches and models across OECD countries in a comparative overview that also presents examples of innovative and recent solutions.

A conflict of interest is an issue that comes between the public duty and private interests of public officials, adversely influencing their official duties. The guidelines establish core principles, policy frameworks and strategies adopted by institutions to manage conflict of interest concerns in the public service. The guidelines are also the first international standard for formulating and applying a conflict of interest policy. In 2003, OECD governments demonstrated their commitment to review and improve their policies in this area by approving these guidelines in the form of an OECD Recommendation.

There is not a ‘one size fits all’ answer to managing conflicts of interest. Specific national contexts should invariably taken into account. Critical elements and core principles can help officials to effectively address conflict of interest issues and shape policy:

  • The public’s interest must always be at the forefront of any decisions made.
  • Scrutiny and transparency should be supported.
  • Organisations should develop a culture of intolerance towards conflicts of interest.
  • Causes such as personal relationships and party-related business undertakings must be taken into account, rather than just financial conflict of interests.
  • Organisational procedures should guide public officials towards disclosing conflicting private interests.
  • Organisational strategies and practices should be developed that identify the variety of conflict of interest situations.

Management measures that ensure the policy framework is implemented cohesively in the workplace are also required:

  • Senior managers should demonstrate a commitment to leadership.
  • A climate of openness should be formed through publishing organisational rules and procedures and provision of advice to public officials. This aids in building partnerships with employees.
  • Organisations should undertake periodic reviews of management arrangements to assess their vigilance towards potential risk areas.
  • Management should be equipped to anticipate potential conflicts and take preventive action in emergent conflict situations, like screening applicants before employment. Policy mechanisms and procedures require regular review and updating to respond to the environment.
  • Preventative measures need effective coordination. Once they are integrated into the organisation’s existing legal, institutional and procedural frameworks, they promote a culture where conflicts of interest are resolved appropriately.
  • The private and non-profit sectors could play a role in keeping policy updated in the context of increased collaboration with public sector organisations. Both sectors can support the progress and implementation of conflict of interest policy for public officials.

Source

OECD, 2003, 'Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service: OECD Guidelines and Country Experiences', OECD, Paris

Related Content

Scaling plastic reuse models in LMICs
Helpdesk Report
2023
Increasing Birth Registration for Children of Marginalised Groups in Pakistan
Helpdesk Report
2021
Maintaining basic state functions and service delivery during escalating crises
Helpdesk Report
2021
Interventions in LICs and LMICs to improve air quality and/or mitigate its impacts
Helpdesk Report
2020

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".