GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Participatory Communication: A Practical Guide

Participatory Communication: A Practical Guide

Library
Thomas Tufte, Paolo Mefalopulos
2009

Summary

How can participatory communication be applied in development projects? This World Bank publication outlines the four key phases of the participatory communication programme cycle. Genuine participatory communication is rare, but it can facilitate the empowerment of marginalised groups and have wider social and political effects. It requires continual dialogue with stakeholders. However, proper application of participatory communication methods are not enough to ensure a project’s success. Broader contextual requirements are important, including a flexible project framework (especially in terms of timelines), a politically conducive environment, and an enabling attitude among key stakeholders.

Participatory communication is an approach based on dialogue, which allows the sharing of information, perceptions and opinions among the various stakeholders and thereby facilitates their empowerment. It is not just the exchange of information and experiences: it is also the exploration and generation of new knowledge aimed at addressing situations that need to be improved. Participatory communication tends to be associated with community-driven development, but it could be used at any level of decision making (local, national, international) regardless of the diversity of groups involved.

By actively engaging stakeholders from the start and by seeking a broader consensus around development initiatives, participatory communication has begun to be considered a crucial tool. This is partly because many conflicts and obstacles can be prevented if addressed quickly. Genuine participation also increases the sense of ownership by local stakeholders, enhancing sustainability.

To be genuinely participatory and truly effective, communication should occur among all parties affected, ensuring all have similar opportunities to influence the outcome of the initiative. Ideally, participatory communication should be part of the whole project process:

  • Two-way communication should be adopted from the beginning and be applied consistently.
  • Full participation by all stakeholders in any step of the process is not possible and, in some cases probably not desirable. Broad consensus may be sufficient.
  • Inclusiveness must be balanced with consideration of stakeholders’ time, resources, interests and knowledge. After their input is taken into account, stakeholders may not need to be involved in detailed decisions beyond the scope of their interests.

The communication programme cycle can run parallel to the project cycle when they both start at the same time. The basic phases of a communication programme are:

  • Phase One – Participatory Communication Assessment (PCA): Issues are researched and analysed through exploratory two-way communication. For these tasks to be successful, it is necessary to establish an open or common space where key stakeholders can interact freely with each other.
  • Phase Two – (Participatory) Communication Strategy Design: Successful strategy design begins with the definition of the objectives. Instances where strategies are designed on broad, poorly understood objectives are surprisingly frequent.
  • Phase Three – Implementation of Communication Activities: An action plan is needed to guide implementation and facilitate the management and monitoring of all relevant activities.
  • Phase Four – Monitoring and Evaluation: Evaluation should be planned from the beginning of an initiative. Furthermore, if participation means that stakeholders are partners in the decision-making process, they must also be partners in impact evaluation.

Source

Tufte, T. and Mefalopulos, P., 2009, ‘Participatory Communication: A Practical Guide’, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Related Content

Responding to popular protests in the MENA region
Helpdesk Report
2020
Government Communication Capacity and Media Freedom
Helpdesk Report
2019
Strengthening the Financial Independence of Independent Media Organisations
Helpdesk Report
2018
Youth initiatives supporting citizen engagement with government
Helpdesk Report
2017

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".