• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»Document Library»Patterns of Conflict and Cooperation in Liberia (Part 2): Prospects for Conflict Forecasting and Early Warning

Patterns of Conflict and Cooperation in Liberia (Part 2): Prospects for Conflict Forecasting and Early Warning

Library
Robert Blair, Christopher Blattman, Alexandra Hartman
2011

Summary

Conflict early warning remains an important but elusive goal in Liberia. If outbreaks of violence could be predicted before they occur, early responders could focus their energies and scarce resources on the highest-risk communities. Is such a goal realistic? Early warning requires a simple system for generating reliable predictions—a system that is not only accurate, but is also consistent over time and across counties and communities. This is a difficult, maybe impossible, task. This report describes results from a two-year study that suggest prediction may be more promising than we initially expected. The report uses fine-grained quantitative data from a survey of 247 rural Liberian towns and villages to assess whether statistical analysis can be used to predict conflict over time. Models built on fewer than 10 risk factors measured in 2008 accurately predict up to 75% of all conflicts two years later. These models are flexible, and can be trained not only to maximize accuracy, but to minimize “false negatives” as well. These models accurately predict 40 to 70 percent of all incidents of conflict (“true positives”), with three to five false alarms (or “false positives”) for each correctly predicted incident. The models are also able to distill a small subset of robust predictors from a long and unwieldy list of potential risk factors. Out of 60 potential risk factors, each model identifies 5 to 10 correlates that are especially powerful in predicting the onset of conflict, and that government and NGOs might use to target high-risk communities. Finally, the report concludes with recommendations for advancing the goal of conflict early warning in Liberia. First, the early warning/early response (EWER) community should focus less exclusively on analysis of past conflicts and more on anticipation of future ones. Second, researchers and NGOs should standardize their indicators for conflict and risk. Third, to test whether these (or alternative) models are consistent outside our sample, the report suggests three possible next steps for data-driven EWER.

Source

Blair, R., Blattma, C., & Hartman, A. (2011). Patterns of Conflict and Cooperation in Liberia (Part 2): Prospects for Conflict Forecasting and Early Warning. New Haven: Innovations for Poverty Action.

Related Content

Responses to conflict, irregular migration, human trafficking and illicit flows along transnational pathways in West Africa
Conflict Analysis
2022
Interaction Between Food Prices and Political Instability
Helpdesk Report
2021
Trends in Conflict and Stability in the Indo-Pacific
Literature Review
2021
Gender and countering violent extremism (CVE) in the Kenya Mozambique region
Helpdesk Report
2020
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023