• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»Document Library»Privatization in Africa: What has Happened? What is to be Done?

Privatization in Africa: What has Happened? What is to be Done?

Library
J Nellis
2003

Summary

Sub-Saharan African states urgently need expanded and more dynamic private sectors. What is the experience of privatisation in Africa? Is privatisation the best way to achieve more efficient infrastructure, utility provision and increased investment? This working paper, produced by the Centre for Global Development, calls for the creation and reinforcement of institutions that underpin market operations.

Generally, African states have been slow and reluctant privatisers. A large proportion of industrial and manufacturing sectors remain under the control of the state, as does most of the infrastructure. Public hostility to privatisation is widespread and defensible, yet costly. African governments and donors have little choice but to experiment with externally supplied substitutes for gaps in local regulatory and legal systems.

Infrastructure controlled by the largest and most economically important state-owned and operated companies (SOEs). Water privatisation in Guinea reflects Africa’s struggle with privatisation. Problems of privatisation, in Guinea and other African states include:

  • Post privatisation when essential commodities became less affordable. In Guinea, water prices went up seven fold between 1989 and 1997, although water quality improved.
  • Whilst the physical water network expanded in Guinea, the rate of growth of provision was less than anticipated. The government was still involved in key parts of the water business and it’s performance continued to be weak.
  • Often, historically, it is the fiscal/ financing problems growing more acute that leads to privatisation and not a failure of efficiency per se. Hence the argument that problems can be tackled by means other than privatisation.
  • When the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) become more directly involved in terms of design and implementation, ownership is seen as diverging out of the hands of Africans themselves.
  • Most African leaders would rather the SOE problem be addressed by means other than ownership change. Privatisation is not widely considered the ideal solution.
  • African states have privatised a smaller percentage of their SOEs (about 40 per cent) than other regions and far less than Latin America. SOEs that have privatised are usually smaller, less valuable concerns.

The African privatisation dilemma, at least for the largest, higher potential firms, is unresolved. Outsourcing and the reliance on external measures are often politically unacceptable and regarded as infringements of sovereignty or suggestive of African incompetence. The real answers lie in the internal evolution of institutional and political frameworks, unlikely in the foreseeable future. However, interim and innovative measures for infrastructure provision include:

  • Outsourcing institutional provisions. For instance by contracting regulatory and monitoring activities from skilled outsiders.
  • Using private firms to carry out administrative functions that usually impede investment and privatisation. For example British Crown Agents are used to handle procurement of government contracts in Mozambique thus speeding up the contracting process and lowering transaction costs.
  • Promoting offshore commercial arbitration mechanisms. For instance, several small island states in the Caribbean use British courts to arbitrate contractual disputes between governments and private providers.
  • Using respected Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) to vet transactions. For example, Transparency International oversaw the telecommunications licence auction in Slovakia.
  • Offsetting risk for investors can help mobilise financing. The World Bank may offer investors partial guarantees against sovereign, political and regulatory risks.

Source

Nellis, J., 2003, ‘Privatization in Africa: What has happened? What is to be done?’, Center for Global Development, Working Paper No. 25, Center for Global Development. Washington D.C.

Related Content

Interventions in LICs and LMICs to improve air quality and/or mitigate its impacts
Helpdesk Report
2020
Monitoring Air Quality in Low- Income and Lower Middle-Income Countries
Helpdesk Report
2020
Prevalence of health impacts related to exposure to poor air quality among children in Low and Lower Middle-Income Countries
Helpdesk Report
2020
Water Finance and Nature-based solutions
Helpdesk Report
2020
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more