GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Public Service Delivery in a Democratic, Developmental State

Public Service Delivery in a Democratic, Developmental State

Library
E Fakir
2007

Summary

The public service in a democratic developmental state focusses not only on the delivery of services, but is also crucial for economic and social development. This paper from the Centre for Policy Studies examines the challenges of public service delivery in South Africa. Effective reorientation of public services in the post apartheid state will require skilled professional public servants who are responsive and accountable to the needs of the people they serve.

Ideologically, a developmental state’s mission is to ensure economic development. The state structure side provides capacity to implement economic policies effectively and is determined by various institutional, technical, administrative and political factors. The state should have autonomy from social forces so that it can devise long-term economic policies free from myopic private interests. The developmental state should be a strong state with the administrative capacity and political wherewithal to push through a developmental agenda. Finally, the state should have a social anchoring which prevents it from using its autonomy in a predatory manner and enables it to gain adhesion of key social actors.

Since the inception of the democratic state in 1994, the key developmental challenge in South Africa has been to create a public service environment where citizens no longer feel humiliated and denigrated.

  • The state has to be responsive to development challenges within the context and environment that it functions in, otherwise citizens’ needs will not be met. In the early transition years, for example, a lack of co-operation and integration between public service departments led to schools and houses being built in areas with no running water or electricity.
  • The manner in which the public service interacts with the public can have a substantial impact on the way citizens view and discharge their obligations to the state. Because perceptions of the public service are formed by experience of services, negative experiences seem to taint the entire public service.
  • Despite a great amount of government spending on redistribution, high levels of poverty persist and the government is perceived of as inefficient. Such dissatisfaction with service delivery has resulted in 700 social protests over the last ten years.
  • There tends to be no clear standards for the quality of service rendered. Where standards do exist, there are no consequences for the failure to achieve them. Should this become embedded, it would be difficult to change.

Whilst the challenges of public service delivery have been recognised by Government, there is a predominant focus on instrumental management driven solutions. These must be combined with targeted interventions to effect a change in the culture of the public service at all levels and avoid eroding its credibility and legitimacy. The public service will thus require public servants that are professional, skilled and adequately remunerated and who recognise that they are ultimately servants of the people. Furthermore, the public service needs to:

  • focus on responsiveness to the public, executive government, politicians and the social and political environment
  • focus on accountability to the public, executive government and politicians
  • address internal challenges, which include monitoring and evaluation, management of financial resources, acquiring relevant skills, investing in proper knowledge management systems, streamlining services, recruiting, training, attracting and retaining appropriate skills, and instituting an appropriate ethical regime.

Source

Fakir, E., 2007, 'Public service delivery in a democratic, developmental state', Centre for Policy Studies, Johannesburg

Related Content

Scaling plastic reuse models in LMICs
Helpdesk Report
2023
Increasing Birth Registration for Children of Marginalised Groups in Pakistan
Helpdesk Report
2021
Maintaining basic state functions and service delivery during escalating crises
Helpdesk Report
2021
Interventions in LICs and LMICs to improve air quality and/or mitigate its impacts
Helpdesk Report
2020

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".