GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Reform, Modernisation and Perspective of the Security Organization of Mongolia

Reform, Modernisation and Perspective of the Security Organization of Mongolia

Library
Gerel Myagmarjav (ed.), DCAF
2005

Summary

Former communist countries in particular are confronted with security sector institutions which lack the capacity to ensure the safety and security of both their citizens and the state. This paper, published by the Geneva Centre for Democratic Control of Armed Forces and the Institute for Defence Studies of Mongolia, is a summary of the status of security sector reform (SSR) and unresolved reform issues in Mongolia. Despite security sector framework’s progress, Mongolia faces difficulties implementing defence sector, police and border protection services reform.

Until the end of the Cold War, Mongolia’s government reflected the ideology and organisational structure of its neighbour, the Soviet Union. After establishing republic status in 1990, the country created a multi-party democracy and adopted a new constitution in 1992. It also established economic and diplomatic relations with the West and began to adopt SSR legal frameworks.

Mongolia is currently conducting reform of security sector professionalism and organisational structures, and modernisation of arms and military techniques. It is also pursuing personnel skills development, management reforms and improved social welfare of its soldiers. It has increased its cooperation with foreign military forces and international security organisations.

However, while some progress has been made, substantial changes in the internal management and operation of the security sector have not occurred. Ongoing SSR challenges include:

  • Defence sector: Reform calls for increased professionalism, military structural changes and implementation of national security strategies. Some progress has been made, but lack of funding and the legacy of the communist management mentality hamper reform. The sector’s bureaucratic structure is large and costly. Effective decision making approaches are absent; there is a clash of professional interests among military organisations.  Communication with the public on defence issues is rare.
  • Border Protection: Reform calls for establishing professional, capable border organisations, improved border security technology and participation of local administrations, supervisory authorities and civilians located close to the border. However, due to lack of funding, technology reform is moving slowly. Living conditions of border troops are inadequate.
  • Police: Reform calls for organisational re-structuring, improved  knowledge of criminal law procedures and a more effective performance in combatting crime and protecting citizens. There has been some progress in personnel training, reform of the police academy’s curriculum and cooperative programmes with international police institutions. Despite these improvements, the public complains of police abuse of citizens’ human rights.

Above all, SSR in Mongolia needs to strengthen security personnel training and fund security sector technology at all levels. Other recommendations include:

  • improve the response to terrorism, contining cooperation with international security institutions in both anti-terrorist activities and citizen safety;
  • establish legal confirmation of civilian security sector control;
  • increase public communication on security sector policy and strategic objectives.
  • improve agency coordination in the fight against crime;
  • address the public perception of human rights abuses by police and strengthen police training on criminal law and human rights; and
  • increase the border protection budget to improve border personnel living conditions.

Source

Myagmarjav, G. (Ed.) (2005). 'Reform, Modernisation and Perspective of the Security Organization of Mongolia', Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) / The Institute for Defence Studies of Mongolia.

Related Content

Varieties of state capture
Working Papers
2023
Non-State Policing in Fragile Contexts
Helpdesk Report
2019
Drivers and enablers of serious organised crime in Southeast Asia
Helpdesk Report
2019
Serious and Organized Crime in Jordan
Helpdesk Report
2019

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".