GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Rethinking spatial inequalities in development: The primacy of politics and power relations

Rethinking spatial inequalities in development: The primacy of politics and power relations

Library
Abdul-Gafaru Abdulai
2014

Summary

This paper offers a political explanation to the problem of spatial inequality in developing countries, paying particular attention to the implications of patronage politics and inter-elite power relations for the spatial distribution of public goods. It argues that prospects for overcoming spatial inequalities in the clientelist-driven political environments of developing countries depend substantially on how elites from lagging regions are incorporated into ruling coalitions.

It emphasises the need to understand ‘powerlessness’ of lagging regions as stemming not necessarily from their exclusion from political decision making structures, but also from their incorporation into such structures on terms that potentially underpin their poverty.

The paper notes that, given resource scarcity in developing countries, ethno-regional groups seek access to influential positions in government to present group interests in the decision-making process. In such contexts, comprehensive policies that skew benefits towards the poorest are more likely to be sustainably implemented when elites who directly represent the interests of those segments of the population have substantial influence over resource allocation and broader policy. Strategies to address inter-regional development gaps could therefore consider ways of shifting power relations in favour of poorer regions.

Source

Abdulai, A. G. (2014). Rethinking spatial inequalities in development: The primacy of politics and power relations. ESID Working Paper No. 29. Effective States and Inclusive Development (ESID). Manchester: University of Manchester.

Related Content

Varieties of state capture
Working Papers
2023
Who are the Elite Groups in Iraq and How do they Exercise Power
Helpdesk Report
2018
Social exclusion
Topic Guide
2015
Political systems
Topic Guide
2014

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".