GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»The Complexity of Applying UN Resolution 1325 in Post Conflict Reintegration Processes: The Case of Northern Uganda

The Complexity of Applying UN Resolution 1325 in Post Conflict Reintegration Processes: The Case of Northern Uganda

Library
Grace Maina
2011

Summary

How effectively have the needs of women and girls been addressed during rehabilitation, reintegration and post-conflict reconstruction in Uganda? This study looks the reintegration experience of women and girls after the long war between the Ugandan government and the Lord’s Resistance Army. The study analyses the situation in the context of UN Security Council Resolution 1325, which calls on all actors to address the special needs of women and girls during rehabilitation, reintegration and post-conflict reconstruction. The study concludes that, since the female populations in northern Uganda still struggle with deprivation, want and exclusion, it is difficult speak of meaningful and durable peace.

Following a recent period of relative calm in northern Uganda, communities have begun to return to their ancestral homes from internally displaced peoples camps. This return process and resettlement has had serious implications for women. The social groupings women formed in the camps are often broken following the move back to traditional communities. Long distances curtail the association of women to learn and to advance their own meaningful reintegration into society. This has rendered the engagement of women in post-conflict settings weak and has continued to foster a male dominance that is unaware of women’s specific needs.

UN Resolution 1325 recognises the role of women’s participation in the promotion and maintenance of peace and security. It underlines the fact that sustainable peace processes require that all people live free from want and fear. However, in northern Uganda, the reintegration process has only deepened the fear and needs of the female population:

  • The female returnees’ lack of skills and the absence of learning support has greatly reduced their capacity to provide for themselves
  • There are numerous accounts of rape and forced marriages that undermine the social position of these women in society
  • The programme currently in place fails to take into account the particular dynamics of returning females. For example, it ignores the fact that many of girls have children
  • Few women – especially at grassroots level – know of Resolution 1325. This curtails their involvement in issues of peacebuilding and post-conflict reconstruction.

The failure to address the real needs of the female returnees renders the process of reintegration weak. Resolution 1325 provides the potential to advocate for both the meaningful participation of women in issues of peace and to champion women’s needs in post-conflict settings. In order for it to be effective:

  • Women must be critical instruments to creating peace, in their various capacities and at several levels
  • There must be meaningful and context-responsive education of the provisions of Resolution 1325, to raise awareness among and promote the involvement of women
  • Advocacy and action around issues raised by Resolution 1325 should be promoted at all levels
  • Women’s unique experiences of war and of reintegration need to be recognised
  • Communities – and, more specifically, men – need to be made aware of the importance of women’s involvement in creating peace.

Source

Maina, G., 2011, 'The Complexity of Applying UN Resolution 1325 in Post Conflict Reintegration Processes: The Case of Northern Uganda', African Centre for the Constructive Resolution of Disputes (ACCORD), Durban

Related Content

Norm diffusion: How global gender norms are adopted in low and middle-income countries
Working Papers
2023
Donor Support for the Human Rights of LGBT+
Helpdesk Report
2021
Interventions to Address Discrimination against LGBTQi Persons
Helpdesk Report
2021
Documentation of survivors of gender-based violence (GBV)
Helpdesk Report
2021

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".