GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»The police, the people, the politics: Police accountability in Kenya

The police, the people, the politics: Police accountability in Kenya

Library
Michelle Kagari, Sophy Thomas
2006

Summary

What is the state of police accountability in Kenya? This report from the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative examines the development of the Kenyan police force and the legal and political context within which it operates to assess the likelihood of progress toward a more democratic and accountable police service. It concludes that while Kenya’s police force currently falls well short of the standards of democratic accountability, the country is ready for and capable of effective police reform.

The Kenyan police force has historically been used a political tool. Indeed, interference by politicians into police operations is officially sanctioned in law. As a result, a culture of corruption, impunity and violence pervades the police force, undermining citizen trust and respect for the rule of the law.  Further deficiencies include the lack of adequate transparency within the police force, with secrecy frustrating reform efforts; the lack of political will at key points in the government blocking the reformist agenda; tight restrictions on civil society preventing it from playing a more effective role in pushing police reform; and uncertainty about roles and responsibilities among different branches and agencies of the justice system causing confusion and inefficiency

To reform its police force, Kenya must build upon a framework based on principles of accountability, where clear standards are established and appropriate sanctions put in place for those who transgress. The police should be accountable both to the government and to the citizens. Reform must be comprehensive to be effective, encompassing all sectors and actors within the justice system. Several challenges emerge, however, when implementing reform within the Kenyan context:

  • Previous attempts at reform have been stalled or actively prevented from succeeding, leading many to doubt the potential for progress.
  • Existing external accountability mechanisms have been allowed to languish, undermining people’s confidence in such systems.
  • Existing system for processing citizen complaints is completely opaque and unresponsive, again undermining support for similar accountability practices.
  • Police working conditions are detrimental to morale and are not conducive to developing a sense of professional pride. Specifically, honesty is not sufficiently rewarded.

Given these challenges, efforts at restoring democratic ideals and introducing true accountability in the Kenyan police force should begin with the basics. Legislation is a good starting point, but it must be supported by the introduction of mutually reinforcing mechanisms to ensure adherence and sustainability. Progress will be gradual; therefore commitment must be assured and long term in scope. Key recommendations for reforms include:

  • Undertake and implement legislative reforms: Review all laws related to policing to ensure clarity of roles, responsibilities, and standards of ethics. Also emphasize the right to information to reduce the culture of secrecy.
  • Establish and strengthen independent mechanisms for accountability: Set up an external complaints body to handle police malfeasance while strengthening the independence and capabilities of senior leadership and existing mechanisms.
  • Implement operational reforms: Codify better standard operating procedures for policing and improve the welfare of police officers to reduce the opportunities and incentives for corruption and extortion.
  • Build political will: Reform must find support at the top to be effective. Intensive advocacy is needed to convince unresponsive leaders of the need for critical police reform.

Source

Kagari M., Thomas S., 2006, 'The police, the people, the politics: Police accountability in Kenya', Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI), Nairobi

Related Content

Non-State Policing in Fragile Contexts
Helpdesk Report
2019
Drivers and enablers of serious organised crime in Southeast Asia
Helpdesk Report
2019
Serious and Organized Crime in Jordan
Helpdesk Report
2019
Donor work on security and justice in the Eastern Caribbean
Helpdesk Report
2017

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".