GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Traditional Risk-sharing Arrangements and Informal Social Insurance in Eritrea

Traditional Risk-sharing Arrangements and Informal Social Insurance in Eritrea

Library
GebreMichael Kibreab Habtom, Pieter Ruys
2006

Summary

In the absence of formal safety nets, can Eritrea’s traditional system of voluntary mutual aid community associations (Mahber) be extended to cover unexpected health costs and other related costs? This study examines the role of kinship networks and Mahber, and assesses the potential of Mahber-based health insurance schemes for the informal sector and rural poor. It finds that where the state no longer provides free public health services and access to private insurance is denied, Mahber -based health insurance is a viable way of providing modern health services.

In Eritrea, neither the state nor the market is effective in providing health insurance to low-income people in the rural and informal job sector. Part of the problem lies in the fact that low and irregular incomes mean that there is little profit to be made. Therefore, traditional Eritrean communities use their local social capital to alleviate unexpected social costs. Traditional risk-sharing arrangements are made within extended families and mutual aid community associations.

The primary aim of community-based social insurance schemes is to pool the resources of a group (mainly of socially excluded individuals) to protect all members against the financial effects of the health risks and unexpected costs.

  • Joining together into a group means that the financial costs of the health risks can be distributed among the members, as each member pays a premium.
  • Mahber-based social insurance schemes can substantially improve the health situation for poor households.
  • Individual and household characteristics play a role in the viability of Mahber-based social insurance schemes.
  • In areas with widespread poverty and a scattered population, setting up Mahber-based social insurance scheme is more difficult than in richer and more densely populated areas.

Setting up Mahber-based social insurance organisations can help to fight poverty at the local level.

  • The transformation of voluntary mutual aid community associations into Mahber-based social insurance schemes requires the active role of central and local government, and the involvement of local and international NGOs.
  • The inclusion of health care insurance into traditional mutual aid community associations may make the system complex technically and administratively.
  • With the help of the government and NGOs, technical and managerial skills can be built up.
  • Mutual aid community associations can be formalised with legal and political support.
  • In due course, it should be possible to extend Mahber-based social insurance to cover the entire population, including the self-employed (such as farmers and fishermen), the elderly, dependent, disabled and unemployed.
  • Strategies that could be used to develop such an insurance system include earmarked taxation.

Source

Habtom G. K. and Ruys P., 2006, 'Traditional Risk-sharing Arrangements and Informal Social Insurance in Eritrea', Health Policy, vol. 80, no.1, pp. 218-235

Related Content

Social protection
Topic Guide
2019
Social protection and child labour in Asia
Helpdesk Report
2017
Design and implementation
Topic Guide
2015
Types of social protection
Topic Guide
2015

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".