GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Urban Governance for Adaptation: Assessing Climate Change Resilience in Ten Asian Cities

Urban Governance for Adaptation: Assessing Climate Change Resilience in Ten Asian Cities

Library
Thomas Tanner et al
2009

Summary

How can climate-related impacts be managed in urban settings? What are the links between urban governance, climate adaptation, poverty reduction and sustainable development? This paper develops an analytical framework by combining governance literature with climate resilience assessments conducted in ten Asian cities. The climate-resilient urban governance assessment framework involves: (1) decentralisation and autonomy, (2) accountability and transparency, (3) responsiveness and flexibility, (4) participation and inclusion and (5) experience and support. Use of this framework can assist in assessing and building urban resilience to climate change in a way that reduces the vulnerability of the citizens most at risk from climate shocks and stresses.

Climate change adaptation research has largely ignored poor urban populations in favour of rural livelihood-focused activities because the latter depend on natural resources directly affected by climate change. But rapidly expanding urban settlements in the developing world face severe climatic risks. Urban populations will be forced to cope with increased incidents of flooding, air and water pollution, heat stress and vector-borne diseases.

Cities in developing countries are at particular risk due to their high-density populations, lack of adequate drainage, concentration of solid and liquid waste, informal settlements and urban expansion onto risky sites. Increased climate hazards coupled with rapid urbanisation are likely to put increased strain on local governments as they attempt to respond to the vulnerabilities of the urban poor.

There are five key considerations for assessing and building urban resilience to climate change in a way that reduces the vulnerability of the citizens most at risk from climate shocks and stresses. These form the basis of a climate-resilient urban governance assessment framework:

  • Decentralisation and autonomy: Cities suited to building climate change resilience avoid cyclical political stalemates and achieve situations where national, state and city ruling parties can work together quickly and effectively to implement policies and programmes.
  • Accountability and transparency: Delivery of climate-resilient urban development relies on a municipal system that is accountable to its citizens. Openness in financial management in key ‘climate sensitive’ sectors is needed. Such sectors include waste, water, disaster risk reduction, urban planning and pro-poor service provision.
  • Responsiveness and flexibility: Agencies and management systems must be flexible in order to respond to and anticipate climate hazards. An inter-agency, cross-government body dedicated to tackling the potential and actual impacts of climate change is desirable. Finances must be made available to upgrade buildings and infrastructure to withstand future climate extremes.
  • Participation and inclusion: The impact of climate change in urban areas is likely to disproportionately affect the poorest and most vulnerable. Their integration in decision-making and policy processes is crucial for building climate resilience.
  • Experience and support: Cities possessing experience of developing integrated, people-centred early warning systems for extreme events are better placed to make progress toward climate change resilience. The less event-driven aspects of climate change, associated with slowly increasing stresses on water supplies, waste management, and environmental services, require external agency and civil society experience and assistance.

Source

Tanner, T., Mitchell, T., Polack, E. and Guenther, B., 2009, 'Urban Governance for Adaptation: Assessing Climate Change Resilience in Ten Asian Cities', Working Paper 315, Institute of Development Studies (IDS), Brighton UK

Related Content

Lessons from Local Governance Programmes in South Sudan
Helpdesk Report
2018
Local Governance in South Sudan: Overview
Helpdesk Report
2018
M&E methods for local government performance
Helpdesk Report
2017
Evidence and experience of procurement in health sector decentralisation
Helpdesk Report
2017

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".