GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Violent extremism in Africa

Violent extremism in Africa

Library
2016

Summary

This paper analyses data from three regional “hotspots” of violent extremism in sub-Saharan Africa: Boko Haram in the Lake Chad region; Ansar Dine, al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), and al Mourabitoun (among others) in the Sahel; and Al Shabaab in the Horn of Africa. It suggests that security-related issues are a priority for citizens of countries that have experienced high levels of extremist activity. However perceptions of problems varied widely by country.

Afrobarometer’s Round 6 surveys in 2014/15 asked security-related questions in several countries that have experienced growth in violent extremism in recent years.  Security-led approaches have largely failed to contain the geographic footprint of violent extremisms in sub-Saharan Africa, and this has prompted the emergence of more development-orientated approaches, such as CVE and PVE. Across 36 countries surveyed in 2014/15, about one in five citizens cited security-related issues as one of the three most important problems facing their country.  The proportion of citizens who cited security among the top three national problems was significantly lower in Cameroon, Niger and Uganda than elsewhere.

  • Public trust in security forces varies widely by country with trust generally lower in the police than in the army.
  • Public approval of government counter-extremist efforts ranged from about four in 10 in Nigeria and Kenya to three-quarters or more in Mali, Cameroon, Niger, and Uganda.
  • Support for strengthening military responses and capabilities were high countries in which the question was asked.
  • Four in 10 Kenyans, Nigerians and Malians cited security-related issues as one of the top three problems facing their countries – roughly double the average across 36 countries surveyed in 2014/15.
  • Security was a higher priority for additional government spending in Nigeria, Kenya and Cameroon.
  • Across 36 countries, only half of respondents said they trust the police “somewhat” or “a lot”, while 64% said they trust the army. Among the six countries under study, trust levels were highest in Niger and the lowest in Nigeria.
  • Nigerians were more likely to believe that there was local and international support for extremist groups like Boko Haram than their counterparts in Cameroon and Niger, and were also far more critical of government counter-extremist efforts. In Niger and Cameroon, bolstering the military response was significantly more popular than in Nigeria.
  • 75% of Malians said that negotiation between the government and armed groups was the best way of addressing the crisis in the North of the country.
  • Public approval of the government’s response to extremism was considerably lower among Kenyans (44%) than among Ugandans (83%).

This public opinion research offers insight into violent extremism’s impact on ordinary citizens that can help shape CVE and PVE approaches that place emphasis on the environment in which violent extremism thrives. This data highlights the greater need to address root causes of conflicts and build stronger relationships between governments and local communities.

Source

Buchanan-Clarke, S. & Lekalake, R. (2016). Violent extremism in Africa: Public opinion from the Sahel, Lake Chad, and the Horn. Accra and Nairobi: Afrobarometer.

Related Content

Responses to conflict, irregular migration, human trafficking and illicit flows along transnational pathways in West Africa
Conflict Analysis
2022
Cross-border pastoral mobility and cross-border conflict in Africa – patterns and policy responses
Conflict Analysis
2022
Incorporating Gender Perspective in Peace Operations since 2018
Helpdesk Report
2021
Maintaining basic state functions and service delivery during escalating crises
Helpdesk Report
2021

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".