• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»Document Library»What is Vote Buying?

What is Vote Buying?

Library
F Schaffer
2002

Summary

Vote buying is a widespread phenomenon. It is usually viewed as a purely economic exchange in which the voter sells his or her vote to the highest bidder. Yet, does this view correspond to reality? What does ‘vote buying’ mean? What different forms does it take in different locales around the world? This paper, presented at an MIT conference, examines vote buying from the perspective of both candidates and voters.

In offering money, goods, or services there are three ways in which givers might hope to get recipients to vote, or not to vote, for a particular candidate. First, givers might hope to produce instrumental compliance. If successful, recipients change their electoral behaviour in exchange for tangible rewards. Second, givers may hope to generate normative compliance. If successful, recipients change their electoral behaviour because the offer convinces them of the goodness or worthiness of the candidate. Third, givers may hope to generate coercive compliance by bullying recipients into changing their electoral behaviour. If successful, recipients fear retribution if they decline the offer. To recipients, the act of accepting an offer may hold a variety of meanings. It might constitute making a contract, securing amends, receiving a gift, accepting an auction bid, recognising power, compromising one’s principles, acknowledging goodwill, or more. In accepting or rejecting offers, or in changing or not changing their electoral behaviour, recipients may be acting, among other things, out of fear, duty, indignity, gratitude, righteousness, or calculated self-interest.

More historically textured or ethnographic accounts reveal that what scholars habitually call ‘vote buying’ carries different meanings in different historical and cultural contexts. It is more than a mere economic transaction. It is a combination of economic exchange and social ritual. Other conclusions from the study are that:

  • The choice of offer strategies made by candidates and the meanings attached to offers by voters are shaped by their institutional, socio-economic, and organisational contexts
  • The prospect of receiving material offers generates expectations among potential recipients which impose a form of accountability on politicians
  • The effectiveness of efforts to eliminate the practice of ‘vote buying’ depends on how well reformers anticipate the menu of offer strategies available to candidates and whether they take into account the particular meanings recipients attach to the offers.

Exploring real world variations gives us as better fix on the range of phenomena conventionally covered by the category “vote buying”. The paper makes it clear that:

  • Scholars should abandon the oversimplified view of ‘vote buying’ as a pure market transaction
  • Reformers should carefully explore the possible offer strategies available to candidates before trying to change their behaviour
  • Reformers should take into account particular meanings attached to offers by recipients before trying to change the behaviour of voters.

Source

Schaffer, F. 2002, 'What is Vote Buying?', paper presented at Trading Political Rights: The Comparative Politics of Vote Buying, international conference, Center for International Studies, MIT, Cambridge.

Related Content

Donor Support to Electoral Cycles
Helpdesk Report
2021
Donor support for post-conflict elections
Helpdesk Report
2017
Religious leaders and the prevention of electoral violence
Helpdesk Report
2016
Factors supporting the emergence of democracies
Helpdesk Report
2016
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023