GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Who is Black in Brazil? A Timely or a False Question in Brazilian Race Relations in the Era of Affirmative Action?

Who is Black in Brazil? A Timely or a False Question in Brazilian Race Relations in the Era of Affirmative Action?

Library
Sales Augusto dos Santos
2006

Summary

Who is black in Brazil? This article from Latin American Perspectives examines racial discrimination in Brazil. It argues that Brazil’s myth of racial democracy limits realistic discussion of racism and racial identity because it prevents the identification of dysfunctional race relations. The important question with regard to affirmative action is not who is black, but rather what sort of society do Brazilians want to build.

In 2001, race became part of Brazil’s national agenda under the pressure of black social movements for the establishment of university admission quotas. Affirmative action policies of this sort, however, face strong resistance. One of the principal arguments used against admission quotas is that it is impossible to know who is black in Brazil. However, available statistics and data make clear that people and institutions in Brazil face no insurmountable difficulties in identifying who is black. Rather the problem is in being able to acknowledge the existence of exclusion and discrimination or the measures that are necessary to tackle the problem.

Brazil’s system of racial classification is indeterminate and subjective. Given substantial miscegenation, it is no small task for Brazilians to adopt a rigid and standardised system of biologically-based racial classification. However, from a socio-political perspective there is little difficulty in identifying who is black in Brazil:

  • The identity of Brazil’s Native American population is closely related to its experience of physical and symbolic violence. Given the reality of racial discrimination, there is no reason why black identity cannot be established in the same way.
  • Records of police violence and homicide demonstrate a clear racial pattern among targets of police brutality and murder. Police officers and ‘unofficial’ death squads seem to have little difficulty in identifying blacks.
  • While a bipolar black-and-white classification has not been widely adopted, there are no significant socioeconomic differences between blacks and pardos (mixed race). Both groups, however, differ tremendously from whites.
  • The racial stratification of power and prestige in Brazil is well-defined and extremely rigid. Whites occupy the top echelons, while blacks and pardos are actively excluded.

It is not difficulty in identifying who is black that makes it impossible to answer the question of who is black in Brazil. Rather it is the myth of racial democracy, which:

  • limits any serious or realistic discussion of racism and racial identity in Brazil. The myth of racial democracy encourages the maintenance of a dangerous status quo, in which dysfunctional race relations cannot be identified or commented upon;
  • promotes the illusion that racial mix has brought an end to colour distinctions. From a biological perspective, that Brazilian society is multiracial, cannot be denied. However, confusing biology with the social aspects of race generates the illusion of equality; and
  • renders all blacks invisible, negating their very existence and stripping them of their uniqueness and humanity. Thus, the myth of racial democracy reinforces the most fundamental aspect of racism – the dehumanisation of the racially oppressed.

Source

dos Santos, S. A., 2006, 'Who is Black in Brazil? A Timely or a False Question in Brazilian Race Relations in the Era of Affirmative Action?', Latin American Perspectives, Volume 33, Number 4, pp. 30-48

Related Content

Affirmative action around the world Insights from a new dataset (update)
Working Papers
2023
Social development and human development
Topic Guide
2015
Social exclusion
Topic Guide
2015
Contemporary conflict analysis of Iraq
Conflict Analysis
2014

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".