GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»GSDRC Publications»Gender Equality in Fragile States

Gender Equality in Fragile States

Helpdesk Report
  • Huma Haider
November 2010

Question

What interventions in fragile states have promoted gender equality, and have also supported peacebuilding and state-building?

Summary

To date, the debate on state fragility has failed to take into account gender dimensions; and policy-makers have often ignored issues of gender in state-building approaches and interventions. The vast majority of the literature on gender and state-building is critical of donor approaches and interventions. Gender is typically seen as a luxury that should be left aside until the issues of security and governance are addressed. Where there is commitment to integrate gender into state-building programmes, interventions have often been in gender-stereotyped programme areas such as health, education and sexual violence. Gender here is equated with women’s ‘special needs’, neglecting power relations between women and men and within society as a whole. The result is that gender is not applied as a meaningful analytical framework; and gender dynamics are not properly addressed in security and governance, which are considered ‘gender neutral’. This undermines the impact and effectiveness of state-building interventions.

The literature presents a range of findings, lessons and recommendations for interventions in fragile states aimed at gender equality and state-building. These include:

  • Gender needs to be understood “politically”, as an issue of power relations.
  • Non-state structures are often of greater importance to women in fragile states.
  • Efforts should be made to consolidate changes in gender relations that have taken place during periods of conflict.
  • Increasing women’s representation in security and governance institutions can improve legitimacy of the institution and result in more effective community relations.
  • Quotas for women’s representation in security and governance institutions are insufficient.
  • Gender responsive budgeting has the potential to transform gender inequalities and can be an important approach for discussions on gender and fragility.
  • Women activists and women’s organisations in fragile states need to be strengthened.
  • Both men and women need to be engaged.
  • Gender mainstreaming is important but should be considered in context.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID Politics and State Team

Related Content

Donor Support for the Human Rights of LGBT+
Helpdesk Report
2021
Interventions to Address Discrimination against LGBTQi Persons
Helpdesk Report
2021
Documentation of survivors of gender-based violence (GBV)
Helpdesk Report
2021
LGBT rights and inclusion in Small Island Developing States (SIDS)
Helpdesk Report
2021

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".