GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»GSDRC Publications»Multi-donor Funding for Elections in Fragile States

Multi-donor Funding for Elections in Fragile States

Helpdesk Report
  • Claire Mcloughlin
July 2008

Question

Please provide examples of good practice in multi-donor funding for elections in post-conflict or fragile states (e.g. pooled or basket funding arrangements). What areas of activity have these funds supported? How were they governed and co-ordinated?

Summary

Basket funds have to date often been administered by UNDP, as was the case in Congo, Tanzania, Sierra Leone, Nigeria and Togo. The main activities they have supported have been: technical assistance to the Electoral Management Body (EMB), voter registration, voter education, election monitoring, and support for civil society.

Basket funds usually operate with a two-tiered management structure: a policy or technical oversight committee (Steering Committee), and a day-to-day Programme Management Unit (PMU). The PMU reports to the Steering Committee, which usually includes contributing donors, the EMB and representatives from civil society. In addition, wider consultation is often facilitated through a stakeholder forum.

Whilst Pakistan, Tanzania and Togo are considered successful cases of basket funding, common challenges include: weak communication, coordination and consensus among actors, limited involvement of key stakeholders, poor time management and drawn-out recruitment processes.

It is suggested that the effective management of basket funds requires:

  • a clear separation of roles
  • an early assessment to define appropriate components of the basket
  • timely and frequent reporting on behalf of the PMU
  • a strong understanding of financial rules and regulations.
file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID Afghanistan

Related Content

Donor Support to Electoral Cycles
Helpdesk Report
2021
Responding to popular protests in the MENA region
Helpdesk Report
2020
Government Communication Capacity and Media Freedom
Helpdesk Report
2019
Strengthening the Financial Independence of Independent Media Organisations
Helpdesk Report
2018

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".