GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Multi-Hazards
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Professional development packs
    • Reports & literature reviews
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Our team
    • 25 years advancing evidence
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»In a Weak State: Status and Reintegration of Children Associated with Armed forces and Armed Groups (CAAFAG) in Nepal

In a Weak State: Status and Reintegration of Children Associated with Armed forces and Armed Groups (CAAFAG) in Nepal

Library
O Housden
2009

Summary

Despite Nepal’s 2006 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) targeting rehabilitation of children from armed group associations, the government has failed to implement satisfactory reintegration. This paper, published by the Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, reviews the current status of the reintegration of Children Associated with Armed Forces and Armed Groups (CAAFAG). State failure to tackle deep-rooted inequality and structural problems continues to allow armed movements to recruit marginalised groups, including children, and consequently flourish.

Deeply-rooted poverty and lack of opportunity allowed vulnerable children to be exploited by the Communist Party of Nepal-Maoist (CPN-M) in the recent Maoist insurgency. The CPN-M successfully recruited vulnerable children, aged 10 to 16, forced them to perform spy and messenger services and accompany reconnaissance missions during the country’s civil war.

Responding to the CPA’s commitment to reintegrate these children into society, Nepalese and international non-governmental organisations (NGOs) formed the CAAFAG in 2007 to harmonise efforts to release the children. Reintegration packages fostered by the group include education, income generation and community-based programmes to assist the children’s reintegration into society.

Despite the short time the CAAFAG working group has been operating, it is possible to make the following observations about child reintegration progress to date:

  • Education projects targeting CAAFAG have been fruitful, with returnees performing well in a variety of educational programmes. Income-generation programmes have been less encouraging – many projects are under-funded, too short and lack follow-up.
  • Exact numbers of CAAFAG recruits and their whereabouts are largely unknown. NGOs are often unable to assist CAAFAGs, including girls who are stigmatised for their CPN-M involvement, married off or moved to another village and rejected by their families.
  • Despite overt statements of support, the government has not been supportive of the reintegration process. It has not begun to construct a framework for the child reintegration programme.
  • Lack of consensus between and among major political parties hinders not only child reintegration efforts but prevents the enforcement of laws against torture of children.
  • Despite their rhetoric, the CPN-M continues to flout regulations over illicit recruitment of children. Rival coalition and opposition parties and insurgents have created paramilitary youth wings and are fostering militant youth activities.
  • Both the Nepalese legal system and the wider culture do not recognise the need to institutionalise children’s rights.

To date, the CAAFAG working group has performed reintegration coordination well. However, the following issues are cause for serious concern:

  • More CAAFAGs need to be located;
  • Psychological and sociological impacts of conflict on CAAFAGs need to be assessed;
  • Greater political capital and a government framework must be created to provide direction to civil society, which is bearing the lion’s share of CAAFAG reintegration efforts; and
  • More internal dissent and international pressure is needed to force the government to act upon CAAFAGs and decrease the low intensity violence the country is currently experiencing.

Source

Housden, O., 2009, 'In a Weak State: Status and Reintegration of Children Associated with Armed forces and Armed Groups (CAAFAG) in Nepal', IPCS Research Paper, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, New Delhi

Related Content

GESI Dimensions of Human Smuggling and Trafficking in East Africa
Helpdesk Report
2023
Nigeria's Role in World War Two
Helpdesk Report
2023
Challenges and Limitations to Entering the Workforce in Jordan for People with Disabilities
Helpdesk Report
2023
Donor Support for the Human Rights of LGBT+
Helpdesk Report
2021

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".