GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Multi-Hazards
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Professional development packs
    • Reports & literature reviews
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Our team
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: National Consultations on Transitional Justice

Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: National Consultations on Transitional Justice

Library
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
2010

Summary

How can national consultations support effective transitional justice programmes? This report presents national consultations as a crucial element of the human rights-based approach to transitional justice. A process of consultations ensures that there is local ownership and participation and can bolster transitional justice programmes by reigniting stalled peace processes and triggering community debate. Donors should periodically conduct consultations during the implementation of a transitional justice programme, with a view to recalibrating it and enhancing its impact.

In post-conflict settings, one of the key components to reconciliation is a system of transitional justice which examines the root causes of conflict and the human rights violations that occurred during the conflict. Consultations enable people affected by past oppression or conflict to inform the design of transitional justice programmes by freely expressing their views in a secure environment. Consultations are a form of respectful dialogue, not one-way information or public relations exercises. Even if consultations are not acted upon, they are valuable sources of information about the capacity and willingness of communities to undertake reconciliation, and about the assistance they need.

A well-designed national consultation exercise must take account of the forms of transitional justice that are envisaged for a country: the design of criminal justice-related consultations may look very different from, and be more limited than, those preceding a non-judicial exercise. Well-designed national consultations should:

  • Be preceded by a mapping exercise, taking account of previous conflict patterns, to determine where consultations should take place
  • Involve all the key stakeholders, including victims and witnesses of past patterns of abuse and oppression
  • Be conducted in times of relative peace and security and when the relevant communities are available
  • Be conducted by independent experts who have no stake in specific transitional justice outcomes
  • Provide the people to be consulted with information of the transitional justice options open to them and of the specific purpose of the consultations, so that they can express informed viewpoints
  • Note that while most consultations have used qualitative methods, such as focus groups, interviews and participant observation, quantitative methodologies such as surveys can also be used.

Even well-designed consultation processes are not without risk or the possibility of bias. Below are steps policymakers can take to minimise bias and to maximise consultation effectiveness:

  • Consultations should be conducted with a sense of propriety and in a manner that is culturally sensitive to local conditions, demonstrating respect for victims
  • An enabling and protective national legal environment for consultations must be in place, ensuring that people are not at risk of prosecution for anything they might say
  • The report of a consultation exercise must always be true to the views that have been expressed, while avoiding the exposure of particular individuals or communities to retaliation.

Source

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 2010, 'Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: National Consultations on Transitional Justice', United Nations, New York and Geneva

Related Content

GESI Dimensions of Human Smuggling and Trafficking in East Africa
Helpdesk Report
2023
Nigeria's Role in World War Two
Helpdesk Report
2023
Challenges and Limitations to Entering the Workforce in Jordan for People with Disabilities
Helpdesk Report
2023
Donor Support for the Human Rights of LGBT+
Helpdesk Report
2021

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".