GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Sri Lanka: Twenty years of make-believe – Sri Lanka’s Commissions of Inquiry

Sri Lanka: Twenty years of make-believe – Sri Lanka’s Commissions of Inquiry

Library
Amnesty International
2009

Summary

Despite the creation of a Commission of Inquiry of human rights violations in Sri Lanka, why do human rights violations continue to take place and why is justice not achieved? This report by Amnesty International seeks to highlight the issue of impunity in Sri Lanka and the role of the Commission of Inquiry set up to investigate violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law. The report concludes that in the case of Sri Lanka the Commission of Inquiry did not perform well. The report offers recommendations to the Sri Lankan government as well as to the international civil society in order to bring justice to the victims of human rights violations in Sri Lanka.

The Commission of Inquiry was created to examine selected serious cases of human rights abuse that had not been effectively investigated by the police or prosecuted by the Attorney General’s Department. With impunity being the norm in Sri Lanka, it was common for human right violations to go unpunished. The inefficient justice system provided the necessary conditions for government officials to hinder prosecutions from taking place. Nevertheless, the Commission of Inquiry failed to redress the situation and did not perform well as a mechanism for justice in Sri Lanka, which merely became a truth-telling exercise.

In September 2006, President Mahinda Rajapaksa announced that he would invite an International Independent Group of Eminent Persons (IIGEP) to act as observers of the activities of a local Commission, which would investigate the violations. However in November 2008, the IIGEP quit once it was clear the Sri Lankan government was unwilling to protect its citizens and uninterested in securing justice. In the end, IIGEP concluded that the Commission of Inquiry was not meeting international standards in five key areas, identifying:

  1. Serious conflicts of interest which persist that compromised the independence of the Commission.
  2. Lack of effective victim and witness protection.
  3. Lack of transparency and timeliness in the proceedings.
  4. Lack of full cooperation by state bodies.
  5. Lack of financial independence.

With the incompetence of the government to bring justice to all victims, the ineffectiveness of the Commission of Inquiry, the inability of the IIGEP to bring about reform, and the growing number of human right violation committed by both the government and the opposition forces, Amnesty International calls for a change of debate which refocuses on preventing the continuation of violations and ensuring real accountability for past abuses. In its conclusions, Amnesty International urges the international community to provide the leadership, resources and political will to call individuals to account that are currently missing in Sri Lanka. In its recommendations Amnesty International calls upon the government of Sri Lanka to:

  • initiate, implement and support a national policy aimed at bringing perpetrators of human rights violations to justice;
  • publicly acknowledge and forcefully denouncing wrongdoing by government forces;
  • ensure effective investigations, due process and swift prosecution of all perpetrators, including those enjoying political influence and high social status; and
  • establish and support an adequately resourced, carefully instituted and technically well-supported witness protection system.

Source

Amnesty International, 2009, 'Sri Lanka: Twenty years of make-believe - Sri Lanka's Commissions of Inquiry', Amnesty International

Related Content

Varieties of state capture
Working Papers
2023
Donor Support for the Human Rights of LGBT+
Helpdesk Report
2021
Promotion of Freedom of Religion or Belief
Helpdesk Report
2021
Impact of COVID-19 on Child Labour in South Asia
Helpdesk Report
2020

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".