GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Multi-Hazards
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Professional development packs
    • Reports & literature reviews
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Our team
    • 25 years advancing evidence
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Making the case for security sector reform in Zimbabwe

Making the case for security sector reform in Zimbabwe

Library
Knox Chitiyo
2009

Summary

What role should security sector reform play in Zimbabwe’s renaissance? This paper, published by the Royal United Services Institute in September 2009, argues that security sector reform (SSR) must be a fundamental component in Zimbabwe’s stabilisation and reconstruction, and suggests ways to achieve this. Zimbabwe’s economy has revived since the establishment of the Government of National Unity  (GNU) in February 2009. However, developments in the security sector will dictate whether the nation’s recovery is durable or temporary.

Zimbabwe’s Government of National Unity (GNU) was created on 15 February 2009 and has achieved more than many had hoped. Inflation has been reduced, supermarkets have full shelves, the South African rand and the US dollar are now used for trading, and civil service employees have returned to work.

There are seven key developments that are ‘frontloading’ security and SSR onto the national agenda in Zimbabwe:

  1. The National Security Council has been established and convened for the first time. It will be the key forum for civilian oversight of civil-military relations.
  2. The National Organ on Healing and Reconciliation has begun the difficult but vital task of social peacemaking. The security sector will have to acknowledge the violence against civilians over the past four decades.
  3. The regional and international community is beginning to engage with Zimbabwe. This will have to be buttressed by a coordinated approach to political and security sector engagement with Zimbabwe.
  4. Zimbabweans themselves (including many in the security sector) have expressed the desire for a new national security agenda.
  5. Political violence continues and there has also been a surge in random crime. Only a return to de-politicised security sector mandates and capabilities will enable these threats to be addressed.
  6. The 15 September 2008 Global Political Agreement (GPA) which led to the creation of the GNU, has past its first anniversary. There will be intense scrutiny of what has been achieved in the domain of security.
  7. Zimbabwe has a history of excellence in international peacekeeping operations, but security at home has to be better aligned with international competency.

Zimbabwe cannot be seen as a ‘classic’ post-conflict nation because peace in this instance was brokered between politicians rather than between military groups. SSR in Zimbabwe may be messy and open-ended.

Zimbabwe needs a National Defence and Security Strategy (NDSS) to define a road map for security in Zimbabwe.

  • The NDSS would need to integrate traditional defence policy with the state and security sector’s responsibility to provide human security to all of Zimbabwe’s people.
  • The NDSS would be part of a wider political, economic and judicial reform process that has already begun. SSR would be an integral part of the NDSS.
  • Although there is a role for international assistance in the NDSS process, it must be Zimbabwean-led. The NDSS should be a consultative process and should not be punitive.
  • Zimbabwe needs a Truth and Reconciliation Commission. There can be no sustainable peace without formal acknowledgment of the violence by both perpetrators and victims.
  • The UK still has an important role to play in Zimbabwe’s security transformation. There is scope for a mutually beneficial Zimbabwe-UK security and development partnership.

Source

Chitiyo K., 2009, 'Making the case for security sector reform in Zimbabwe', Occasional Paper, Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), London, United Kingdom

Related Content

GESI Dimensions of Human Smuggling and Trafficking in East Africa
Helpdesk Report
2023
Varieties of state capture
Working Papers
2023
Serious and Organised Crime in Tanzania
Helpdesk Report
2023
Serious and Organised Crime in South Africa
Helpdesk Report
2023

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".