GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Improving Transparency and Accountability in the Budget Process: An Assessment of Recent Initiatives

Improving Transparency and Accountability in the Budget Process: An Assessment of Recent Initiatives

Library
Ruth Carlitz
2012

Summary

Budget transparency has in recent decades come to be seen as a pillar of good governance by international organisations and civil society groups. This article reviews budget-related transparency and accountability initiatives (TAIs) to analyse their impact. Cross-national academic studies find that budget transparency is correlated with better credit ratings, better fiscal discipline, less corruption, and higher political turnout. Case studies in Brazil, Uganda, Tanzania, Pakistan, and South Africa show a mixed picture of the impact of independent budget groups.

While there are many examples of success in terms of budget processes around the world being opened up to greater participation and scrutiny, there is no single recipe for creating a successful initiative to enhance transparency and accountability in the budget process. A consistent set of factors does however appear across those TAIs defined as successful in various ways. These include:

  • building horizontal and vertical alliances between stakeholders,
  • the production of legitimate information,
  • legal empowerment,
  • international support.

The article concludes by identifying ways in which knowledge of the effectiveness of TAIs could be improved, including the comparison of successful and unsuccessful cases, the collection of time-series data, better qualitative research, and various methodological innovations.

Source

Carlitz, R. (2012). Improving Transparency and Accountability in the Budget Process: An Assessment of Recent Initiatives. Development Policy Review.

Related Content

Infrastructure Project Failures in Colombia
Helpdesk Report
2018
Who are the Elite Groups in Iraq and How do they Exercise Power
Helpdesk Report
2018
Local financing for infrastructure in Zambia
Helpdesk Report
2017
Implementing Public Financial Management Reform
E-Learning
2017

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".