GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»The Partnership of Free Speech and Good Governance in Africa

The Partnership of Free Speech and Good Governance in Africa

Library
Winnie Mitullah, Paul Kamau
2013

Summary

New data from Afrobarometer, collected during face-to-face interviews with 51,605 people in 34 countries during 2011-13, finds that freedom of speech is strongly linked to popular perceptions of both media effectiveness and good governance. People who indicate they are free to say what they think also report higher levels of trust in their leaders, lower levels of corruption, and better government performance – especially greater success in fighting corruption. Greater freedom of expression is also linked to mass media that are more effective in keeping a watchful eye on government.

These findings can be interpreted in several ways. It is possible that capable, effective and trustworthy governments also grant greater freedoms to their people and their media. Or alternatively, when society and the media are free to express demands and hold government accountable, government becomes more effective. Or both.

The survey also finds that, while new communications technologies such as mobile phones are making inroads in Africa, the continent has some way to go in achieving full protection of the right to free speech, and in realizing the benefits associated with societies that can communicate freely.

Key Findings:

  • Just half of Africans (49%) across 34 countries say that they are ‘completely free’ to say what they think, while another quarter (26%) say they are at least ‘somewhat free’.
  • Open countries like Malawi, Tanzania and Liberia – where at least three-quarters of citizens feel completely free to express themselves – contrast sharply with countries like Burkina Faso, Swaziland, Zimbabwe, Cote d’Ivoire, Togo and Sudan, where only about one in four perceive unrestricted opportunities for free speech.
  • Popular demand for media freedom is solid, with 57% endorsing an unfettered right to publish; the proportions range from 52% in West Africa to 72% among East Africans.
  • Citizens give high marks to their national media for effectiveness in revealing government mistakes and corruption; an average of 71% say the media in their country is either ‘somewhat’ or ‘very effective’. But this average masks wide differences, from 40% in Madagascar and 43% in Zimbabwe, to 80% or more among Malawians and Egyptians. East Africans are much more likely (81%) to rate their media as effective watchdogs compared to all other regions.
  • Individual freedom of speech and media effectiveness go hand in hand; the two are strongly and positively correlated.
  • Freedom of speech is also strongly linked to citizens’ ratings of their leaders: greater freedom is associated with higher levels of trust in leaders and lower reported levels of corruption.
  • Freedom of speech is also associated with higher ratings of government performance across all sectors, especially with respect to fighting corruption.
  • Television is an increasingly important source of news for Africans. North Africans use television far more than do people of other regions.
  • Findings confirm that mobile phone penetration in Africa is both growing and widespread. An average of 84% of respondents now use cell phones at least occasionally, and in 20 countries tracked since 2008, access has increased substantially compared to just a few years ago. The only exception is Madagascar, where access to cell phones remains low, and almost unchanged, at 45%.
  • Internet usage, by contrast, has increased only marginally, and from a much lower base; an average of 18% of respondents access the internet on at least a monthly basis, but this ranges from nearly twice as many (34%) in North Africa, to less than one in ten (9%) in West Africa.

Source

Mitullah, W. & P. Kamau (2013). The Partnership of Free Speech & Good Governance in Africa, Policy Brief No #3 October 2013, Afrobarometer.

Related Content

Varieties of state capture
Working Papers
2023
Donor Support for the Human Rights of LGBT+
Helpdesk Report
2021
Promotion of Freedom of Religion or Belief
Helpdesk Report
2021
Impact of COVID-19 on Child Labour in South Asia
Helpdesk Report
2020

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".