GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»What Does it Take to Mainstream Disaster Risk Management in Key Sectors?

What Does it Take to Mainstream Disaster Risk Management in Key Sectors?

Library
Aditya Bahadur, Amy Kirbyshire, Dina Khan, Mihir Bhatt
2014

Summary

Actions towards development must be compatible with a changing climate. This requires each country to have a plan to avoid the losses and damages associated with extreme weather and to make disaster resilience central to economic and social policies.

This guide draws on the experience of CDKN’s programmes on climate-related disaster risk management (DRM) within the context of climate compatible development. It explores why mainstreaming DRM into development policy has had widely varying results between countries. In doing so, it attempts to delve beneath the surface of mainstreaming and identify the ways forward for integrating short- and long-term considerations for disaster risk reduction in important development sectors.

The paper demonstrates that effective mainstreaming requires a supportive policy environment, leadership, knowledge of the relevant risks, risk management techniques that are appropriate to each context, consistent financing and innovation. It draws on empirical examples and relevant literature to suggest how to achieve these elements and presents a clear way forward for governments seeking to mainstream disaster risk across different sectors.

The key messages for governments are:

1. Focus on amending and altering institutional practices

  • Reduce compartmentalisation, initially through small-scale strategic coordination.
  • Include mainstreaming in the remit of key officials.
  • Organise training for staff charged with planning functions in ministries.
  • Create incentives for action on mainstreaming.

2. Develop enhanced processes for understanding risk

  • Ensure that the planning of policy processes is open to diverse stakeholders.
  • Mandate risk evaluation, including through legislation.
  • Promote risk evaluation methods that are not data intensive.
  • Work closely with people who will use the data emerging from risk assessments.
  • Access and share risk assessment tools.
  • If needed, look at the feasibility of establishing technical bodies for risk assessment.

3. Acknowledge that mainstreaming processes are highly political

  • Give the intended beneficiaries of mainstreaming processes a voice.
  • Use the available tools to map political risks.
  • Build political momentum by understanding the costs and benefits of mainstreaming.

4. Build effective partnerships

  • Explore vertical partnerships between higher and lower levels of government for conducting risk analysis.
  • Shape business opportunities for private sector involvement in risk management.
  • Enhance interactions between staff in sectors and organisations with experience in mainstreaming.

Source

Bahadur, A et al. (2014). What does it take to mainstream disaster risk management in key sectors? Climate and Development Knowledge Network Guide. Overseas Development Institute, Leadership for Environment and Development and All India Disaster Management Institute.

Related Content

Scaling plastic reuse models in LMICs
Helpdesk Report
2023
Role of Faith and Belief in Environmental Engagement and Action in MENA Region
Helpdesk Report
2021
Areas and Population Groups in Pakistan Most Exposed to Combined Effects of Climate Change, Food Insecurity and COVID-19
Helpdesk Report
2021
Trends in Conflict and Stability in the Indo-Pacific
Literature Review
2021

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".