• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
  • Blogs
Home»Document Library»A Theory of Change: A thinking and action approach to navigate in the complexity of social change processes

A Theory of Change: A thinking and action approach to navigate in the complexity of social change processes

Library
Iñigo Retolaza
2011

Summary

What is a Theory of Change (ToC) and why is it important? This guide to understanding and developing a ToC shows how a ToC helps to configure the conditions needed to achieve desired change, using the experience of a given context. This is done partly by making assumptions explicit and by analysing them critically. It is also a monitoring tool that facilitates accountability. A good ToC allows development practitioners to handle complexity without over-simplification.

The systematic use of a ToC helps practitioners to be constantly aware of the need to review and update their assumptions about a change process. Using it with other stakeholders enables a shared view of reality and, therefore, of the change process. At the same time, by including stakeholders from different political and identity-based positions, the exercise helps in the political process of achieving coordinated action agreements based on negotiating shared meanings.

A theory of change is a multi-stakeholder, collaborative experiential learning exercise that encourages the development of the flexible logic needed to analyse complex social change processes. It is also:

  • A creative visualisation exercise that enables practitioners to focus on specific future realities that are both desirable and probable.
  • A set of assumptions about how reality could unfold in the immediate future, based on analysis of the current context, a self-assessment of capabilities for process facilitation and a critical review of assumptions.
  • A thinking-action approach that helps to identify milestones and conditions that need to occur if the desired change is to happen.
  • A semi-structured change map that links strategic actions to certain desired results.
  • A process tool that helps to monitor individual and collective ways of thinking and acting.

A theory of change is not a definitive recipe that eliminates the uncertainty of complex and emerging social processes, or a blueprint of how change has to (or is going to) happen. Nor is it a substitute for the Logical Framework as a rigid planning tool.

In order to create a ToC, it is important to understand the purpose of the change, the issues involved, and the main stakeholders. Further steps are to:

  • Establish the time span of change.
  • Create the story that would explain the change in the particular context: the historical background, the political, social and economic conditions affecting or being affected.
  • Study conflict areas and their causes: relationships between the stakeholders, societal structures and other initiatives that could help or hinder change.
  • Make sure the underlying assumptions of the ToC are valid and accurate: consider what might not be obvious. This needs to be constantly reconsidered and adjusted throughout the process.
  • Determine the Pathway of Change: the strategic areas and objectives that will be the focus of action, and the conditions that need to be met in each area.
  • Understand the factors that oppose or support the change process: strategic alliances with other stakeholders, the social and political capacities of stakeholders to create a more inclusive process, the mechanisms for accountability, learning and decision-making.
  • Determine who collects, selects and analyses the change indicators, and establish their purpose.
  • Establish who takes part in the design and implementation of monitoring and accountability systems, integrate lessons learnt for future actions and find ways of achieving deeper and more contextualised social learning process.

Source

Retolaza, I., 2011, 'Theory of Change: A thinking and action approach to navigate in the complexity of social change processes', Humanist Institute for Development Cooperation / United Nations Development Programme

Related Content

Lessons from stabilisation, statebuilding, and development programming in South Sudan
Helpdesk Report
2020
Doing research in fragile contexts
Literature Review
2019
Designing, Implementing and Evaluating Public Works Programmes
Helpdesk Report
2018
Indicators and Methods for Assessing Entrepreneurship Training Programmes
Helpdesk Report
2018
birminghamids hcri

Contact Us Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more