GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Access to Justice and Legal Process: Making Legal Institutions Responsive to Poor People in LDCs

Access to Justice and Legal Process: Making Legal Institutions Responsive to Poor People in LDCs

Library
M R Anderson
2003

Summary

How can it be ensured that the poor are protected by the law in the same way that the rich are? What factors deter the poor from using the legal system?

This paper examines the issues surrounding the judicial and legal systems in developing countries. It questions the claim that the rule of law helps to alleviate poverty. It also recognises that it is often the poor that are most vulnerable to being abused politically and unable to protect themselves against the injury and economic loss associated with such abuse. Elsewhere, the author argues that poverty remains a problem partly due to the powerlessness of the poor in existing political and social structures. The report also states that abuses of political power, which are not investigated, can undermine growth in a country.

There are a number of ways in which lawlessness contributes to poverty and disempowerment. These include: Unchecked abuses of political power; unchecked violence by police, prison officers and other public officials; regular payment by the poor for public goods and basic services to ensure access; and risk of losing property to either public or private theft, which is greater amongst the poor.

The poor are marginalised in the legal system as a result of:

  • The failure of the judicial system to enforce political accountability (due either to the constitution, legislation or the lack of judicial independence)
  • The lack of financial resources and ability to understand and use the system
  • Reluctance to use the law, often due to living in illegality, possessing a mistrust of the law, the existence of alien legal idioms and formalities
  • Lack of participation in civil society groups struggling for human rights.

Problems within the judicial system need to be addressed. Processes need to be utilised more efficiently in order to provide protection and redress against abuses of power by state agencies. Some suggestions for reform include:

  • Eradicating laws with a recognisable anti-poor agenda
  • Improving access to the legal system for individuals and NGOs acting in the public interest. Public interest and class action litigation has been successful in countries where the law allows it, such as India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, South Africa, Brazil and the Philippines
  • Reducing legal technicalities and simplifying legal jargon
  • Initiatives to increase legal literacy among the poor
  • Using international standards in national courts
  • Judicial training and support
  • Support for law-movements
  • Mobilising the media and NGOs to monitor the implementation of court decisions.

Source

Anderson, M. 2003, 'Access to Justice and Legal Process: Making Legal Institutions Responsive to Poor People in LDCs', IDS Working Paper 178, Institute of Development Studies.

Related Content

Interventions to Address Discrimination against LGBTQi Persons
Helpdesk Report
2021
Justice systems in the Sahel
Helpdesk Report
2020
Rule of Law Challenges in the Western Balkans
Helpdesk Report
2019
Safety, security and justice
Topic Guide
2016

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".