GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Bullets to ballots: The reintegration of UNITA in Angola

Bullets to ballots: The reintegration of UNITA in Angola

Library
Alex Vines, Bereni Oruitemeka
2008

Summary

How does a rebel movement transform itself into the leading party of democratic opposition? What are the prospects of such a party? This Conflict, Security and Development publication examines the development of the Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA) and its emergence as the leading opposition party.

UNITA’s transformation is attributed to acute war weariness after four decades of conflict lead to solutions being sought inside the political process. The support of Non Government Organisations (NGOs) and faith groups are held as key factors in demobilisation and reintegration.

Founded in 1966 by Jonas Savimbi, UNITA exploited feelings of exclusion in the largest ethnic areas of the centre and south. Initially fighting the Portuguese colonial government, civil war was to ensue with the single party socialist government (MPLA) by the end of the 1970s. Initial attempts to resolve the conflict, and demobilise and integrate combatants commenced in the 1990s, but met with failure. This can be partly attributed to limited UN powers in monitoring mandates, funding and enforcement. Disarmament and demobilisation were unsuccessful due to ineffective arms and oil embargoes.

However, the key factor in the breakdown of peace negotiations was the attitude of Savimbi. He was unwilling to hold an opposition role in government, and this led to the resumption of fighting after the 1992 elections. The UNITA leader then refused to sign the Lusaka Protocol in 1994, or attend the inauguration of the National Unity Government in 1997. This ensured the continuation of sporadic conflict during the 1990s.

It was not until the death of Savimbi, combined with a number of other factors, that enabled UNITA to transform itself from a military into a political movement:

  • Savimbi’s immediate successor, Isaias Samakuva, supported the resumption of talks with the government, and was willing to accept an opposition role, stating: ‘UNITA does not plan to, nor could it aspire to run the country alone.’
  • The military defeat of UNITA and combat fatigue removed the ability to wage war. With non-political options removed, there was little choice left but to integrate.
  • 105,000 ex-combatants (including 18 generals) were rapidly demobilised and integrated into the Armed Forces of Angola by October 2003. Relatively successful disarmament occurred with an estimated 90 per cent of weaponry collected.
  • Improved reintegration of former rebels into society since November 2005. With the help of NGOs and faith groups, 63,000 out of 97,114 ex-combatants receive reintegration support.
A direct return to military action for UNITA is now viewed as unlikely, with the main threat to social peace perceived to arise should ex-rebels be significantly sidelined through severe electoral losses. With few signs that UNITA is disadvantaged as a political party by its violent past, it now resembles a typical African opposition party. UNITA prospects are likely to be affected by:
  • Financial disadvantage, with the MPLA directly benefiting from state funding of £23m compared to UNITA’s £14m.
  • The Angolan authorities increased acceptance of opposition party activity as violence recedes. This stands as testament to the success of integration programmes.
  • A broadening appeal, with prospects of traditional MPLA peri-urban supporters voting for this former guerrilla movement to air frustrations. Success is dependent on the voting patterns in the cities.

Source

Vines A. and Oruitemeka B., 2008, 'Bullets to ballots: The reintegration of UNITA in Angola', Conflict, Security and Development, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 241- 263

Related Content

Varieties of state capture
Working Papers
2023
Trends in Conflict and Stability in the Indo-Pacific
Literature Review
2021
Faith-based organisations and current development debates
Helpdesk Report
2020
Responding to popular protests in the MENA region
Helpdesk Report
2020

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".