GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Confining the Freedom of the Press in Singapore: A “Pragmatic” Press for “Nation-Building”?

Confining the Freedom of the Press in Singapore: A “Pragmatic” Press for “Nation-Building”?

Library
Tsun Hang Tey
2008

Summary

Singapore’s sophisticated press control regime is a carefully calibrated combination of persuasion, consent, control and punishment. This paper, published by Human Rights Quarterly, discusses the legal structure constructed by the Singapore government to impose comprehensive control over press freedom. This unique regime has turned the press into an established political institution that plays the role of maintaining the status quo.

International organisations persistently criticise Singapore’s press control regime for its suppression of the press. One view accuses the regime of controlling dissemination of information to the public, serving the Executive’s interests by repressing opposition and suppressing independent reporting.

However, Singapore’s press control regime is more complicated. It has been moulded over decades by legislative amendments carefully crafted by political leadership. It is intended to give effect to a heavily paternalistic political ideology. The Singaporean Fourth Estate model implies that the Executive must be protected from an unrepresentative press capable of obstructing the delivery of good governance.

Strict press control in Singapore is exercised through political and punitive coercion. The main legislation controlling the press – the Newspaper and Printing Presses Act – has been subject to decades of carefully thought-out and finely-tuned amendments controlling press freedom. The following are the results of this legislation:

  • The mission of the Singapore press is confined to simple journalism and straightforward reporting; it must accept its subordinate role as imposed by the Executive.
  • No newspaper is allowed to be printed and published in Singapore without permission from the Government. The government can revoke printing privileges at will; Government-related officials or leaders fill top management of newspaper corporations.
  • Foreign newspapers circulated in Singapore are subject to the political purposes of Executive leadership. Newspapers applying for a permit to circulate must submit themselves to the jurisdiction of Singapore courts.
  • Singapore’s hegemonic culture has contributed to the adoption of the values of political leadership by the press itself. The press now operates within a culture of self-censorship and self-imposed restrictions on individuals who wish to air political views in the mainstream media.
  • Almost three decades of contempt of court judgements against the press continually reinforce press suppression. Large damages have been awarded by Singapore courts against the foreign press and opposition leaders. As a result of these awards, successful bankruptcy proceedings against opposition leaders render them ineligible to contest parliamentary elections.
  • The resulting lack of press freedom indicates Singapore’s lack of interest in achieving an appropriate balance between social interests and the freedom of critical reporting.

Singapore’s press control regime is based on a fundamental fear that the press could become a challenge to dominant political leadership. Its extremely successful legislative controls have achieved the following results:

  • The press performs the task assigned to it by the political leadership;
  • It has become an establishment political institution and maintains the status quo; and
  • It fulfils the vision of political leadership for the press within the overall pragmatic political ideology holding sway over Singapore.

Source

Tey T.H., 2008, 'Confining the Freedom of the Press in Singapore: A “Pragmatic” Press for “Nation-Building”?', Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 876–905

Related Content

Trends in Conflict and Stability in the Indo-Pacific
Literature Review
2021
Faith-based organisations and current development debates
Helpdesk Report
2020
Responding to popular protests in the MENA region
Helpdesk Report
2020
Aid and non-state armed groups
Helpdesk Report
2020

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".