GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Evaluation and civil society: Stakeholders’ perspectives on national evaluation capacity development

Evaluation and civil society: Stakeholders’ perspectives on national evaluation capacity development

Library
Marco Segone, Jim Rugh (Eds.)
2013

Summary

This publication aims to contribute to the international discussions on how different stakeholders can create synergies and partnerships to contribute to equity-focused and gender-responsive country-led evaluation systems. This book highlights in particular the strategic roles of Civil Society Organizations, notably the Voluntary Organizations for Professional Evaluation (VOPEs) are playing to promote the use of evaluation to enhance evidence-based policy-making, transparency and learning; and the role of EvalPartners, the new International Evaluation Initiative to strengthen Civil Society’s evaluation capacities through collaborative partnerships.

The book features contributions from senior leaders of institutions dealing with international development and evaluation. These are: UNEG, UNICEF and UN Women from the United Nations; the Independent Evaluation Group and the CLEAR centres from the World Bank; OECD/DAC Evaluation Network and the Government of Finland from the bilaterals; and the International Organization for Cooperation in Evaluation (IOCE) representing the global community of VOPEs.

The book’s key messages are:

  • National ownership and leadership are overarching factors for ensuring relevant development outcomes
  • National Evaluation Capacities should be seen as integral parts of good governance
  • There is a need to create synergies based on a shared framework for National Evaluation Capacity Development
  • The shared framework for National Evaluation Capacity Development is based on a systems approach, underlining the importance of strengthening both demand and supply capacities for equity-focused and gender-responsive evaluation at three levels: enabling environment, institutional capacities and individual capacities
  • EvalPartners is an international collaborative partnership to strengthen civil society’s evaluation capacities to meaningfully contribute to equity-focused and gender-responsive enhanced evaluation policies and systems
  • There is a growing recognition of the roles of Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) in general, and Voluntary Organizations for Professional Evaluation (VOPEs) in particular in National Evaluation Capacity Development

In addition to national governments and CSOs, different stakeholders within the international community can play helpful roles in supporting National Evaluation Capacities. For example: The United Nation Evaluation Group (UNEG) should:

  • contribute to strengthening evaluation enabling environments by acting as a “neutral broker” facilitating dialogue between the demand and supply side of evaluations for evidence-based policy-making
  • act as a “knowledge broker” facilitating South-South generation and sharing of good practices and lessons learned on equity-focused and gender-responsive country-led evaluation systems;
  • coordinate initiatives with key partners to promote country-led evaluation systems;
  • promote the professionalization of evaluation.

The OECD DAC Network on Development Evaluation should:

  • promote international evaluation standards and guidance;
  • implement targeted capacity building interventions;
  • share evaluation plans;
  • involve partner country stakeholders in evaluations, and
  • fund specific ECD activities.

The CLEAR (Centers for Learning on Evaluation and Results), a multilateral partnership programme, should:

  • support a network of partner countries’ academic
  • institutions, to harness local innovation, knowledge, and experience;
  • integrate this with international know-how in order to develop the capacity of government and civil society.

Source

Segone, M. & Rugh, J. (Eds.). (2013). Evaluation and civil society: Stakeholders’ perspectives on national evaluation capacity development. UNICEF, IOCE and EvalPartners.

Related Content

Trends in Conflict and Stability in the Indo-Pacific
Literature Review
2021
Faith-based organisations and current development debates
Helpdesk Report
2020
Responding to popular protests in the MENA region
Helpdesk Report
2020
Support for civil society engagement in peace processes
Helpdesk Report
2019

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".