• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»Document Library»Financing and Aid Management Arrangements in Post-Conflict Situations

Financing and Aid Management Arrangements in Post-Conflict Situations

Library
S Schiavo-Campo
2003

Summary

What does the the international experience with post-conflict reconstruction tell us about financing modalities and aid arrangements in post-conflict situations? Are there a series of recommendations that emerge from the experiences of post conflict countries? This paper written on behalf of the World Bank looks at the experience of aid funds in four post-conflict environments. In a general sense a pre-requisite for post-conflict reconstruction and effective financing, is the establishment and maintenance of peace.

An identification of the contextual features of each conflict situation is mandatory for an effective reconstruction strategy and the design of the financing and aid architecture that is to embody that strategy:

  • Each case has its own unique contributing features. In East Timor external assistance was affected by the absence of an administrative capacity, In Bosnia political and administrative fragmentation conditioned everything.
  • Evidence from the four studies shows that a ‘useful checklist’ of possible checks can be identified, some are obvious and none are sophisticated, nor are they necessarily prescriptive.
  • In a general context factors such as a clear mandate, working for genuine partnership and proactive communication are important.
  • In terms of structure and design, to aid in reconstruction a Multi Donor Trust Fund (MDTF) will be set up. An Aid Management Agency (AMA) will act as the bridge between donors and the government.
  • A single umbrella MDTF will accomplish little to aid effectiveness however, if its design is faulty or its provisions are disregarded by donors, or the security environment is unstable.
  • If no donor contributes there is no MDTF. This tautology underlines the necessity to focus on incentives for individual donors to join an MDTF.

In terms of policy, it seems the dynamics of the development business and short-term urgencies typical of a post-conflict situation have often been allowed to prevail over long term institutional objectives.

  • The most obvious, but perhaps important, recommendation is to tailor design and sequencing of financial aid and aid coordination to the circumstances of the specific case.
  • A balance between ‘outsider nationals’ and ‘insider nationals’ is very important for sustainability. The balance must be found, however, by the countries’ people themselves.
  • Local organisations and NGOs should not be by-passed in post-conflict reconstruction programmes. NGOs and local communities are often the only ones capable of implementing activities on the ground.

Source

Schiavo-Campo, S., 2003, 'Financing And Aid Management Arrangements In Post-Conflict Situations', World Bank, Washington D.C.

Related Content

Rebuilding Pastoralist Livelihoods During and After Conflict
Helpdesk Report
2019
Linkages between private sector development, conflict and peace
Helpdesk Report
2017
Libyan political economy
Helpdesk Report
2016
Stabilisation
E-Learning
2016
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more