GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Multi-Hazards
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Professional development packs
    • Reports & literature reviews
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Our team
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Gender-Sensitive and Child-Friendly Budgeting in Zimbabwe

Gender-Sensitive and Child-Friendly Budgeting in Zimbabwe

Library
Bob Libert Muchabaiwa
2010

Summary

This chapter (from a World Bank collection on social accountability initiatives in Africa) seeks to flag lessons (context, processes, and results) for possible replication and further study from two social accountability initiatives in Zimbabwe: (1) the Child-Friendly National Budget Initiative being coordinated by the National Association of Non Governmental Organisations (NANGO), and (2) the Gender Responsive Budgeting Project by the Zimbabwe Women’s Resource Centre and Network (ZWRCN).

Although the initiatives continue, ZWRCN and NANGO have already made some notable impacts. By emphasizing the need for equitable distribution of resources, they have highlighted debate around these crucial issues. Both organizations have built expertise in reading and analysing budgets from a gender-sensitive and child-friendly perspective among national legislators, local government officials, CSOs, and other development practitioners. The results of the two initiatives can be categorized as increased transparency, accountability, and decentralization in policy making and budgeting processes; increased budget allocations; expanded participation and coalition building; and improved policies.

Source

Muchabaiwa, B. L. (2010). Gender-Sensitive and Child-Friendly Budgeting in Zimbabwe. In McNeil, M., & Malena, C. (Eds.), Demanding Good Governance: Lessons from Social Accountability Initiatives in Africa (109-135). Washington: World Bank Institute.

Related Content

Climate Related Fiscal Risk
Helpdesk Report
2023
Increasing Birth Registration for Children of Marginalised Groups in Pakistan
Helpdesk Report
2021
Prevalence of health impacts related to exposure to poor air quality among children in Low and Lower Middle-Income Countries
Helpdesk Report
2020
Impact of COVID-19 on Child Labour in South Asia
Helpdesk Report
2020

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".