GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Impact of Liberalisation on Social Security Arrangements in India

Impact of Liberalisation on Social Security Arrangements in India

Library
P Madhava Rao
2002

Summary

How has economic liberalisation impacted on India’s labour market? How will it affect the provision of social security? This paper for New Delhi’s National Academy for Training and Research in Social Security shows that liberalisation has led to a rise in financial vulnerability among the population. It argues that privatising the welfare state would exacerbate poverty.

Since the early 1990s, India’s economy has opened up to market forces, changing the structure of its labour market. There has been a decline in regular waged employment, and a rise in the number of casual employees and informal sector workers. At the same time, the country’s population is aging. This translates into heavier demands on the welfare state. Yet the government is under pressure to reduce its role in social security provision. In countries like India, where so many are poor, liberalisation measures such as privatising pensions could prove disastrous.

Various sets of data show the changes occurring among India’s aged and working populations. Restructuring in the public and corporate sectors has resulted in redundancies, outsourcing and the casualisation of employment. Both the old and the young are becoming increasingly vulnerable. Key trends are that:

  • The proportion of the population aged 60 or above is predicted to grow by over two percentage points between 1996 and 2016. Around three-quarters of the aged are economically dependent on others.
  • As companies restructure and jobs become less secure, the young are finding it harder to support elderly relatives. Some 21 million people above the age of 60 are still working in order to survive financially.
  • The availability of regular waged jobs decreased dramatically in the 1990s, and organised private-sector employment has fallen since 1999.
  • Rationalisation in the public sector has seen jobs decrease steadily since 1998.
  • The percentage of casual employees in the workforce has grown rapidly in urban and rural areas. In tandem, the number of unorganised workers has grown at double the rate of organised workers.

When poverty is high and growing numbers of workers have no protection, the state has a greater responsibility to ensure the welfare of its citizens. However, proponents of economic liberalisation are pressuring governments to allow private players into social security provision, especially pensions. In India, various proposals have been made, which are criticised here as damaging for the poor:

  • One committee recommended that the government should withdraw from pensions, and all individuals should save for their own retirement. However, wage levels would make this impossible for most.
  • Another suggestion was to allow private players into the pensions market and encourage investment in equity markets. However, this ignores the risks of shares, and would benefit only financial institutions.
  • The financial liberalisation pursued by developed countries is inappropriate for India, where there is strong trust in the welfare state and so many live below the poverty line.
  • Moreover, India has not yet reached an optimal level of social security spending, nor ratified international minimum standards of social security.
  • Thus the government should resist pressure to liberalise further, especially in the area of welfare provision.

Source

Madhava Rao, P., 2002, 'Impact of Liberalisation on Social Security Arrangements in India', National Academy for Training & Research in Social Security, New Delhi.

Related Content

Aid and non-state armed groups
Helpdesk Report
2020
Non-State Policing in Fragile Contexts
Helpdesk Report
2019
The legitimacy of states and armed non-state actors
Topic Guide
2015
Non-state provision of skills development in South Asia
Helpdesk Report
2015

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".