GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Justice-Sensitive Security System Reform in the Democratic Republic of Congo

Justice-Sensitive Security System Reform in the Democratic Republic of Congo

Library
Laura Davis
2009

Summary

What effect has a legacy of impunity for human rights violations had on the security sector in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)? How can the EU incorporate justice-sensitive reform initiatives within security system reform (SSR) programmes? This paper from the Initiative for Peacebuilding examines the need for justice-sensitive SSR in the DRC. It argues that strengthening accountability and integrity in the security system is a priority for SSR which has yet to be addressed in the DRC.

The legacy not only of the DRC’s conflicts, but also of its peace accords and patterns of governance is entrenched impunity for human rights violations. As a result, soldiers and police officers pose a serious threat to the population and to women and children in particular. Tackling the culture of impunity for the most serious offences, including rape and sexual violence, will help to prevent future abuses. It will also help to change the culture of normalisation of human rights violations and contribute to building confidence in the security system.

The security system in the DRC faces a number of problems:

  • Political will for SSR amongst the DRC’s military and political establishment is largely lacking and there is a lack of an overall vision for SSR. Attempts to reform the military will challenge the power and wealth of influential people.
  • The majority of the army is badly trained at best and there is no unified chain of command. The army is ill-disciplined and contains within its senior ranks those who are believed to have committed serious human rights violations.
  • The police are largely incapable of investigating crime, particularly sexual violence and crimes against children. There are widespread reports of extortion, illegal detention, torture, arbitrary killing and sexual violence by police officers.
  • An organic law elaborating the structure of the police force is yet to be passed due to conflict between the Ministries of Justice and the Interior. A fundamental question remains over the role of the police. Democratic oversight remains a challenge.
  • The justice system is unable to deliver day-to-day rule of law or accountability for serious crimes and human rights abuses. Women face almost insurmountable obstacles in seeking justice including for rape and sexual violence.
  • Military tribunals have jurisdiction over international crimes, but have been largely unable to try cases against senior officers. While military courts have made successful convictions, those convicted have not remained in jail or paid damages.
While the EU identifies SSR as a high priority in the DRC, most of its programmes have focused on technical projects. A justice-sensitive approach to SSR focuses on building the integrity of the security system, strengthening its legitimacy and empowering citizens. The EU should take the lead in increasing pressure and support for a justice-sensitive approach to SSR in the DRC. It should:
  • use diplomatic and developmental tools to encourage the successful prosecution, preferably through the Congolese system, of perpetrators of human rights violations within the security system;
  • support a reflection and consultation process with the Congolese authorities, international community and other stakeholders to examine options for vetting processes within the security system;
  • try to mobilise public opinion to create pressure on elites to engage effectively in reform initiatives; and
  • support the UN Mapping Exercise, particularly in addressing gender perspectives.

Source

Davis L., 2009, 'Justice-Sensitive Security System Reform in the Democratic Republic of Congo', International Center for Transitional Justice, Initiative for Peacebuilding, International Alert

Related Content

Varieties of state capture
Working Papers
2023
Donor Support for the Human Rights of LGBT+
Helpdesk Report
2021
Promotion of Freedom of Religion or Belief
Helpdesk Report
2021
Key Drivers of Modern Slavery
Helpdesk Report
2020

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".