• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
  • Blogs
Home»Document Library»Lessons from the African Union Mission for Somalia (AMISOM) for Peace Operations in Mali

Lessons from the African Union Mission for Somalia (AMISOM) for Peace Operations in Mali

Library
Matt Freear, Cedric de Coning
2013

Summary

Mali and Somalia have both suffered Islamist-inspired insurgencies, and in both African Union-led peace operations have been a central pillar in political and security stabilisation efforts. This article argues that, despite challenges in transferring lessons between unique situations, the AMISOM experience can offer some useful lessons for Mali. Factors that helped to drive success for AMISOM included the determination of troop contributors and their funding partners, actively pursuing the support of the host population, adaptability, and working with allied armed groups.

African military operations in Mali and Somalia are at very different stages of matu­rity. The force, and its supporting partners, in Somalia have accumulated a wealth of context specific knowledge and expertise over six years of operations and under its own command. In Mali, AFISMA has only recently been thrust into operations around different areas in the north, with consider­able support from the French.

The major factors that helped to drive success for the AMI­SOM mission (despite serious deficiencies in its early years) were:

  • the determination of troop contributors and their funding partners
  • effective mechanisms to fully engage contributors of troops and police in planning and deci­sion-making
  • blending bilateral support with a long-term and predictable funding stream
  • the gradual escalation of force
  • providing key specialised equipment and enablers
  • actively pursuing the support of the host population, and being mindful of the unfolding political process.

In addition, the African character of the force has been a visible hallmark of the AU intervention in Somalia, with the leader­ship and initial bulk of the fighting forces deployed by a lead-nation, Uganda. And it was important that the lead-nation was gen­erally perceived by the population as a rela­tively benign actor in Somalia.

At the operational and tactical levels, the following features of AMISOM have been helpful: context-specific train­ing, autonomy in commanding operations, a high degree of adaptability, working with allied armed groups in Somalia, and a dogged determination to see the fight through by the nations contributing troops.

The next stage for both operations may be the most challenging yet as African Union troops are called to keep a complex and fragile peace in Mali and Soma­lia. Of additional interest will be the evolving relationships of the AU operations with the UN peace missions in each country. In Soma­lia, despite the conditions not being right for a UN peacekeeping mission, a larger UN political office is set to engage closely with AMISOM, while in Mali a UN peacekeeping mission may soon absorb the mission.

Source

Freear, M. & de Coning, C. (2013). Lessons from the African Union Mission for Somalia (AMISOM) for Peace Operations in Mali. Stability: International Journal of Security and Development, 2(2).

Related Content

Rebuilding Pastoralist Livelihoods During and After Conflict
Helpdesk Report
2019
Linkages between private sector development, conflict and peace
Helpdesk Report
2017
Libyan political economy
Helpdesk Report
2016
Stabilisation
E-Learning
2016

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".