GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Multi-Hazards
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Professional development packs
    • Reports & literature reviews
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Our team
    • 25 years advancing evidence
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Liberia: Uneven Progress in Security Sector Reform

Liberia: Uneven Progress in Security Sector Reform

Library
International Crisis Group
2009

Summary

What is the status of security sector reform in Liberia five years after the end of the conflict? This report from the International Crisis Group assesses current progress and finds programmes long on ambition but short on results. While army reform has made significant strides since the end of the war, police reform and efforts in other areas have proved far less successful. The report warns that unless Liberia is quickly made more secure and stable, the efforts and investment made so far may prove to be in vain.

The context in which the security sector reforms were conceived and implemented was far from conducive. Given the scarcity of resources and the endemic corruption in Liberia, a lot of attention was paid to limiting the costs associated with improving the security sector. Operating under this constraint, strategic planning was often neglected, and oversight structures were poorly designed and enforced.

Nevertheless, the reforms did have the benefit of a strong national consensus of support and a large UN presence. A review of the programmes demonstrates that this complex environment yielded mixed results: 

  • Army reform, particularly the vetting process, has been a provisional success;
  • Police reform has been poor – the police are still viewed to be corrupt and ineffective; and
  • Vigilantism and disrespect of the police is growing in Monrovia

Liberia and the international community face many challenges in continuing with the reform of the security sector. The successes that have been achieved at lower levels in the army structure must be scaled up to include the recruitment and training of a managerial and leadership core. Reforms within the security sector must be linked with other improvements in the general legal and judicial systems to achieve optimal results. Most critically, the Liberian state, which until has previously left the reform programmes to external actors, must take an active role in driving the reforms forward, lest the departure of international partners spell a reversal of progress achieved.

The security situation in Liberia is a complicated one, involving many parties. Recommendations must address each of these actors’ roles individually to ensure a more secure and stable future for Liberia. The report makes the following recommendations:

To the Government of Liberia:

  • Clarify division of roles between security bodies, including deploying the Liberian National Police across the entire national territory and reining in the Special Security Service; and
  • Take clearer control over the provisioning, recruitment, and management of army personnel, ensuring proper civilian oversight of military and national security policy.

To the Government of the United States:

  • Rein in the influence of private military companies through more transparent contracting and improved oversight capabilities; and
  • Provide funds and expertise for the training of army and police personnel, including the embedding of US officers where necessary.

Other Actors:

  • The UN Mission should maintain sufficient peacekeepers on the ground to ensure adequate security and expedite the training and organisational development of the Liberian National Police; and
  • ECOWAS should provide comprehensive support for the security sector through training and emergency guarantees.

Source

International Crisis Group, 2009, 'Liberia: Uneven Progress in Security Sector Reform', International Crisis Group, Brussels

Related Content

GESI Dimensions of Human Smuggling and Trafficking in East Africa
Helpdesk Report
2023
Serious and Organised Crime in Tanzania
Helpdesk Report
2023
Serious and Organised Crime in South Africa
Helpdesk Report
2023
Nigeria's Role in World War Two
Helpdesk Report
2023

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".