GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Monitoring Policy Outputs: Budget Monitoring in Malawi

Monitoring Policy Outputs: Budget Monitoring in Malawi

Library
M Lawson
2002

Summary

A large and growing number of civil society budget groups have taken up work to improve the transparency of their budget processes, as well as to open up avenues for participation. What are the outcomes and lessons learned from Malawi’s budget monitoring experience?

A paper from The International Budget Project addresses that question and describes the monitoring process that civil society organisations in Malawi undertook in the year 2001-2002 budget. Priority Poverty Expenditures (PPEs) were identified and monitored in areas of health, education and agriculture spending. After civil society organizations worked with parliament to identify 12 PPEs areas, civil society networks involved in the relevant areas examined whether these expenditures actually were taking place. They did so by going to the field and visiting a sample of schools, clinics, and agricultural extension stations to assess whether resources were being distributed and whether the extra resources were resulting in increased or improved outcomes.

The findings were disappointing and showed that budget figures sometimes bear almost no relation to actual expenditures. Budget rarely reflects what actually happens. Other findings from the report are:

  • Without protection, laudable budget commitments remain fictional
  • Government has no incentive to clearly show expenditures in the budget that donors will not support or agree with, and as a result the budget set is often unrealistic. This can lead to considerable off-budget expenditure during the year
  • For relatively little cost, civil society can monitor the budget on a nationwide basis and produce credible figures that can have a major impact
  • Working with Parliamentary Committees offers both critical credibility and increased access to information
  • Findings need to be shared with the Government to minimise mistrust and to ensure that the impact is as constructive as possible
  • A structured media strategy is required to maximise the coverage of the findings
  • Budget monitoring can be carried out in the absence of a PRSP. Yet, civil society has an important role in PRSP monitoring by focusing on a number of key public actions in the PRSP and following them through.

Civil society organizations, together with the Parliamentary Budget Committee, have begun pushing for greater transparency and delivery in this year’s Malawi budget. Policy pointers to ensure that resources are monitored from revenue collection all the way through central government down to the grass roots include:

  • Budget should include quantifiable outputs for each PPE
  • PPEs should be protected, with Parliamentary approval required for any budget changes
  • Government must produce transparent and timely expenditure figures
  • The only way that PRSPs can be implemented is to translate them to the budget.

Source

Lawson, M. 2002, 'Monitoring Policy Outputs: Budget Monitoring in Malawi', Oxfam, United Kingdom.

Related Content

Trends in Conflict and Stability in the Indo-Pacific
Literature Review
2021
Faith-based organisations and current development debates
Helpdesk Report
2020
Responding to popular protests in the MENA region
Helpdesk Report
2020
Support for civil society engagement in peace processes
Helpdesk Report
2019

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".