GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Northern Uganda: tradition-based practices in the Acholi region

Northern Uganda: tradition-based practices in the Acholi region

Library
James Ojera Latigo, International IDEA
2008

Summary

To what extent can traditional practices be used to end conflict in Uganda? This study suggests that the Acholi people of Uganda maintain their sophisticated cultural beliefs about the spirit world and their social order. These shape their perceptions of truth, justice, forgiveness and reconciliation, and they would like to use them for conflict resolution. There is a wealth of knowledge inherent in the traditional practices and culture of the Acholi, which offers credible principles for conflict management and harmonious living within the wider global society.

Since independence in 1962, Uganda has witnessed an unbroken cycle of human rights abuses. During this time, the Acholi people in the north have been dominant either as actors or victims. An understanding of the causes and drivers of the conflicts is essential if Uganda is to be able to prevent violence and bring about reconciliation and justice.

The unique importance of the Acholi traditional system of justice is that the perpetrators of atrocities will remain in society even after a peace deal is reached. Unlike the process of the Nuremberg Tribunal, where the victor could walk away after accounts had been settled in ‘judicial’ fashion, the settlement of the Lord’s Rebel Army (LRA) conflict will entail a social future where perpetrators and victims live together.

Social teachings around the traditional concepts have been severely disrupted. There has been a weakening of the authority of the elders in enforcing adherence to local standards. Nevertheless, residents in the internment camps call for the revitalisation of the home-grown traditional practices of their society as opposed to some alien and abstract justice system.

Acholi culture and society are very complex and in a process of constant change. In this context, simplifications are not useful.

  • To ignore or discard traditional ways that have been seen to work in the past makes no sense. On the other hand, they cannot provide the cure for all ills.
  • The positive potential of traditional rituals and beliefs should be seen as complementary to other approaches.
  • The role of traditional leaders and the community ceremonies of reconciliation and other rituals are indispensable mechanisms for trust and confidence building and the enhancement of genuine reconciliation.

Peace and justice will only be achieved in northern Uganda through an inclusive process that involves a wide range of actors embracing victims, bystanders, perpetrators and all other stakeholders.

  • The challenge is to understand and use all different approaches in ways that complement each other synergistically, rather than working against each other.
  • While impunity should not be possible, the objective of achieving justice should be tempered by considerations of healing the afflicted community.
  • Those most affected by the violence should be given a voice in the process by allowing them to use their traditional processes.
  • Only a multi-pronged political approach will be able to address the political issues that were responsible for the outbreak of the conflict.
  • Such a political approach should build trust and reconciliation, rather than vindictiveness based on some abstract justice.

Source

Latigo, J.O., 2008, 'Northern Uganda: tradition-based practices in the Acholi region', in L. Huyse and M. Salter (eds), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Stockholm, pp. 85-122

Related Content

Varieties of state capture
Working Papers
2023
Trends in Conflict and Stability in the Indo-Pacific
Literature Review
2021
Key Drivers of Modern Slavery
Helpdesk Report
2020
Faith-based organisations and current development debates
Helpdesk Report
2020

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".