GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Political Economy Studies: Are They Actionable? Some Lessons from Zambia

Political Economy Studies: Are They Actionable? Some Lessons from Zambia

Library
Monica Beuran, Gaƫl Raballand,, Kapil Kapoor
2011

Summary

This paper examines political economy diagnostics carried out in Zambia and their influence on the World Bank’s support to programmes in that country. It concludes that, while PE analyses are valuable, they need to provide more practical recommendations for approaching change. Country-level PE analysis provides useful background information, but recommendations from sector studies tend to be more actionable. It might therefore be preferable to focus PE studies at the sector level.

PE studies are good at describing the operating environment of a programme or policy and highlighting potential winners and losers. However, PE studies face several important challenges:

  • Governments are often reluctant to collaborate on PE analysis since such studies shed light on existing power structures and on why certain policy decisions, which might be in the best interests of the population, are not being made.
  • PE studies often fail to make practical recommendations, particularly on complex institutional and policy issues that might require long-term engagement.
  • The point of view of the World Bank team members on the ground may not be shared by the management, either because they do not understand the local reality or they do not see the payoffs from a change in approach.
  • PE studies can sometimes go against donor expectations, making implementation of study recommendations more difficult.
  • When teams on the ground are expected to deliver tasks and results in a fairly short period of time, there is a tendency to focus only on ‘manageable’ issues.

Sector task teams need to be involved at all stages of a PE study, otherwise its usefulness is likely to be low. Further:

  • Task teams should invest time in developing the questions they would like the political economy analysis to answer.
  • The analysis should be carried out in a way that is participatory and inclusive.
  • The goal of PE analysis should be to inform staff and management on how sensitive policy and implementation issues should be approached, given the political environment, with the aim of maximising development impact.
  • It is important to have strong support from senior management to carry out PE analysis, while at the same time educating senior political leadership that the objective of such analysis is not to interfere in internal political processes but to better understand the political environment within which economic decisions are being made.
  • PE analysis could be integrated into standard documents, such as sector studies and public expenditure reviews, already being used to support existing operational activities. This would encourage regular updates to be made to PE analyses and would give them a wider audience.

Source

Beuran, M., Raballand, G., and Kapoor, K., 2011, 'Political Economy Studies: Are They Actionable? Some Lessons from Zambia', Policy Research Working Paper 5656, World Bank, Washington DC

Related Content

Regional cooperation and political stability and prosperity
Donor funded alliances promoting regional cooperation
Helpdesk Report
2017
Factors affecting success or failure of political transitions
Helpdesk Report
2017
National climate change governance
Topic Guide
2017

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".