GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Security and Democracy in Southern Africa: Botswana

Security and Democracy in Southern Africa: Botswana

Library
Mpho G. Molomo et al.
2007

Summary

This chapter draws on interviews with key figures in Botswana’s establishment to examine the country’s governance and security sector. It finds that Botswana’s security challenges require regional security co-operation, a reorientation of security policy towards internal threats and a consultative defence review. Botswana’s security policy and resource allocation focus on military strength, yet its key security concerns are largely internal issues that the military is not best suited to address. These issues are cross-border crime, illegal immigrants, refugees (primarily from Zimbabwe), small arms, poverty and HIV/AIDS.

Botswana’s celebrated liberal democracy has limitations. The fragmentation and impoverishment of opposition parties has made the country in effect a one-party state, with little distinction between party and government interests. High growth rates and visible ‘development’ are presided over by a structured autocracy, and the media and civil society are relatively weak.

From the mid-1990s, Botswana enjoyed relative peace, yet continues to allocate about 14 per cent of its budget to defence. However, Botswana’s defence policy is formulated ad hoc, centralised in the Office of the President, and largely responsive. This may reflect the lack of a ministry of defence.

  • The constitution allows the president to deploy the Botswana Defence Force in extra duties, as national security may determine. The military is often asked to assist the police to address challenges such as poaching, border operations, and surveillance related to armed robbery and hijacking. Such operations compromise the professional integrity of career soldiers.
  • The country’s security architecture is based on the Tswana tradition of ntwakgolo ke ya molomo (the best way to resolve differences is through dialogue).
  • As Botswana is landlocked and shares borders with four countries, its relations with neighbouring states are very important. Its government appreciates the need to participate in regional security co-operation and to promote stability and prosperity as the basis of security.
  • Botswana has created a Committee on Small Arms to consider potential problems and the transit of small arms through Botswana. However, the threat posed by small arms is considered relatively small in comparison with that faced by other countries.

Botswana is one of the few countries in Southern Africa where the issue of national security is frequently discussed, and security policy is a concern for a growing number of citizens. A consultative defence review is needed to: 1) address issues such as the army’s apparently disproportionate share of the national budget and its need for increased gender equality; and 2) facilitate greater dialogue, legitimacy, and eventual ownership of defence policy by citizens. Such a review would:

  • Provide the government with a better appreciation of the nature and origins of ‘security threats’, so as to respond to them more effectively
  • Streamline the operations of political instruments and other civil structures, to improve military professionalism and integrity
  • Consider the defence sector in the national context and address broad public sector reforms
  • Assess the size of the defence force, and its training, equipment and welfare needs
  • Entail consultation, to increase understanding of how security problems affect different groups in society
  • Be subject to discussion by cabinet, parliament, and the general public.

Source

Molomo, M. G. et al., 2007, 'Botswana' in Security and Democracy in Southern Africa, Wits P&DM Governance Series, Wits University Press / International Development Research Centre, pp. 61-79

Related Content

Varieties of state capture
Working Papers
2023
Donor Support to Electoral Cycles
Helpdesk Report
2021
Trends in Conflict and Stability in the Indo-Pacific
Literature Review
2021
Faith-based organisations and current development debates
Helpdesk Report
2020

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".